NRS
104.2326 Sale on approval and sale or return; rights of creditors.
1. Unless otherwise agreed, if delivered
goods may be returned by the buyer even though they conform to the contract,
the transaction is:
(a) A “sale on approval” if the goods are delivered
primarily for use; and
(b) A “sale or return” if the goods are delivered
primarily for resale.
2. Goods held on approval are not subject
to the claims of the buyer’s creditors until acceptance; goods held on sale or
return are subject to such claims while in the buyer’s possession.
3. Any “or return” term of a contract for
sale is to be treated as a separate contract for sale within the statute of
frauds section of this Article (NRS
104.2201) and as contradicting the sale aspect of the contract within the
provisions of this Article on parol or extrinsic evidence (NRS 104.2202).
(Added to NRS by 1965,
797; A 1999,
373)
Notes of Decisions
Home Sav. Ass'n v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 708 P.2d 280 (Nev. 1985).
· cites it 12× “The district court also held that the Sales Agreement was a consignment not intended as security, and, therefore, HSA was obliged to protect its interests against a competing secured creditor by taking the steps required of con *600 signors under NRS 104.2326. Since HSA failed…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2326(3) — 1 case
Home Sav. Ass'n v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 708 P.2d 280 (Nev. 1985).
“The district court also held that the Sales Agreement was a consignment not intended as security, and, therefore, HSA was obliged to protect its interests against a competing secured creditor by taking the steps required of con *600 signors under NRS 104.2326. Since HSA failed…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2326(3)(a) — 1 case
Home Sav. Ass'n v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 708 P.2d 280 (Nev. 1985).
“The district court also held that the Sales Agreement was a consignment not intended as security, and, therefore, HSA was obliged to protect its interests against a competing secured creditor by taking the steps required of con *600 signors under NRS 104.2326. Since HSA failed…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2326(3)(c) — 1 case
Home Sav. Ass'n v. Gen. Elec. Credit Corp., 708 P.2d 280 (Nev. 1985).
“The district court also held that the Sales Agreement was a consignment not intended as security, and, therefore, HSA was obliged to protect its interests against a competing secured creditor by taking the steps required of con *600 signors under NRS 104.2326. Since HSA failed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.