Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 104 - UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE—ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2714 (2026)

Buyer’s damages for breach in regard to accepted goods

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.2714  Buyer’s damages for breach in regard to accepted goods.

      1.  Where the buyer has accepted goods and given notification (subsection 3 of NRS 104.2607) the buyer may recover as damages for any nonconformity of tender the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller’s breach as determined in any manner which is reasonable.

      2.  The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.

      3.  In a proper case any incidental and consequential damages under the next section may also be recovered.

      (Added to NRS by 1965, 814)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: In re Gen. Motors LLC, 339 F. Supp. 3d 262 (S.D. Ill. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Gen. Motors LLC, 339 F. Supp. 3d 262 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “3d 792 (noting that the "measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted" (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 104.2714 ) ). • New…”
Goodrich & Pennington Mortg. Fund, Inc. v. J.R. Woolard, Inc., 101 P.3d 792 (Nev. 2004). “1984); see also NRS 104.2714(2) (“The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show…”
Cent. Bit Supply, Inc. v. Waldrop Drilling & Pump, Inc., 717 P.2d 35 (Nev. 1986). “” NRS 104.2714(2). The buyer may also recover consequential damages so long as those damages result “from general or particular requirements and needs [of buyer] of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know 1 and which could not reasonably be prevented by…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2714(2) — 2 cases
Goodrich & Pennington Mortg. Fund, Inc. v. J.R. Woolard, Inc., 101 P.3d 792 (Nev. 2004). “1984); see also NRS 104.2714(2) (“The measure of damages for breach of warranty is the difference at the time and place of acceptance between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, unless special circumstances show…”
Cent. Bit Supply, Inc. v. Waldrop Drilling & Pump, Inc., 717 P.2d 35 (Nev. 1986). “” NRS 104.2714(2). The buyer may also recover consequential damages so long as those damages result “from general or particular requirements and needs [of buyer] of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know 1 and which could not reasonably be prevented by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.