Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.9507 (2026)

Effect of certain events on effectiveness of financing statement

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 104.9507 Effect of certain events on effectiveness of financing statement.

1. A filed financing statement remains effective with respect to collateral that is sold, exchanged, leased, licensed or otherwise disposed of and in which a security interest or agricultural lien continues, even if the secured party knows of or consents to the disposition.

2. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 3 and NRS 104.9508, a financing statement is not rendered ineffective if, after the financing statement is filed, the information provided in the financing statement becomes seriously misleading under NRS 104.9506.

3. If the name that a filed financing statement provides for a debtor becomes insufficient as the name of the debtor under subsection 1 of NRS 104.9503 so that the financing statement becomes seriously misleading under NRS 104.9506:

(a) The financing statement is effective to perfect a security interest in collateral acquired by the debtor before, or within 4 months after, the filed financing statement becomes seriously misleading; and

(b) The financing statement is not effective to perfect a security interest in collateral acquired by the debtor more than 4 months after the filed financing statement becomes seriously misleading, unless an amendment to the financing statement which renders the financing statement not seriously misleading is filed within 4 months after the financing statement became seriously misleading.

(Added to NRS by 1999, 331; A 2011, 627)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1983 · leading case: Jones v. Bank of Nevada, 535 P.2d 1279 (Nev. 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jones v. Bank of Nevada, 535 P.2d 1279 (Nev. 1975). · cites it 4× “One recognized method of disposing of repossessed collateral is for the secured party to sell the collateral to or through a dealer—a method which in the long run may realize better average returns since the secured party does not usually maintain its own facilities for making…”

Iama Corp. v. Wham, 669 P.2d 1076 (Nev. 1983). “NRS 104.9507(1) provides that the injured debtor has a right to recover from the secured party any loss caused by a failure to comply with the provisions governing sales of collateral.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.9507(1) — 1 case

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.9507(2) — 1 case

Jones v. Bank of Nevada, 535 P.2d 1279 (Nev. 1975). “One recognized method of disposing of repossessed collateral is for the secured party to sell the collateral to or through a dealer—a method which in the long run may realize better average returns since the secured party does not usually maintain its own facilities for making…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.