Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 106.300 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 106.300  Definitions.  As used in NRS 106.300 to 106.400, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 106.310 to 106.345, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 725; A 1989, 492)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: Wishengrad v. Carrington Mortg. Servs., 529 P.3d 880 (Nev. 2023).
Wishengrad v. Carrington Mortg. Servs., 529 P.3d 880 (Nev. 2023). · cites it 3× “3 And contrary to the Wishengrads' position, the Maximizer Agreement is not subject to the notice requirements of NRS 106.300 to NRS 106.400 because it is not an encumbrance to secure future advances.”
J.A. Jones Constr. Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co., 127 P.3d 1076 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 2× “An instrument must meet certain requirements in order to be governed by NRS 106.300 to 106.400, thereby receiving priority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.