Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 11 - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.110 (2026)

Occupation under written instrument or judgment; when deemed adverse

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 11.110  Occupation under written instrument or judgment; when deemed adverse.  Whenever it shall appear that the occupant, or those under whom the occupant claims, entered into the possession of premises, under claim of title, exclusive of any other right, founding such claim upon a written instrument as being a conveyance of the premises in question, or upon the decree or judgment of a competent court, and that there has been a continued occupation and possession of the premises included in such instrument, decree, or judgment, or of some part of such premises, under such claim, for 5 years, the premises so included shall be deemed to have been held adversely, except that where the premises so included consists of a tract divided into lots, the possession of one lot shall not be deemed a possession of any other lot of the same tract.

      [1911 CPA § 14; RL § 4956; NCL § 8513]

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2009 · leading case: Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., 664 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (D. Nev. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pac. R.R., 664 F. Supp. 2d 1174 (D. Nev. 2009). · cites it 12× “Adverse Possession Adverse possession can be claimed under two separate sections of the Nevada Revised Statutes: Nev.Rev.Stat. § 11.110 through Nev.Rev.Stat.”
25 Corp. v. Eisenman Chem. Co., 709 P.2d 164 (Nev. 1985). · cites it 2× “” NRS 11.110. 25 Corporation argues that the undisputed facts in this case fail to satisfy these requirements.”
Potts v. Vokits, 692 P.2d 1304 (Nev. 1985). · cites it 2× “NRS 11.110 through NRS 11.150 allow a party to assert his possession against a known claimant, while NRS 40.”
Brundy v. Bramlet, 692 P.2d 493 (Nev. 1985). “*6 See NRS 11.110 et seq.; NRS 40.090 et seq. True owners pay special assessments against their property or face enforcement of a lien against such property to satisfy the obligation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.