Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 111 - ESTATES IN PROPERTY; CONVEYANCING AND RECORDING
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (2026)

Bona fide purchaser: Conveyance not deemed fraudulent in favor of bona fide purchaser unless subsequent purchaser had actual knowledge, constructive notice or reasonable cause to know of fraud

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 111.180  Bona fide purchaser: Conveyance not deemed fraudulent in favor of bona fide purchaser unless subsequent purchaser had actual knowledge, constructive notice or reasonable cause to know of fraud.

      1.  Any purchaser who purchases an estate or interest in any real property in good faith and for valuable consideration and who does not have actual knowledge, constructive notice of, or reasonable cause to know that there exists a defect in, or adverse rights, title or interest to, the real property is a bona fide purchaser.

      2.  No conveyance of an estate or interest in real property, or charge upon real property, shall be deemed fraudulent in favor of a bona fide purchaser unless it appears that the subsequent purchaser in such conveyance, or person to be benefited by such charge, had actual knowledge, constructive notice or reasonable cause to know of the fraud intended.

      [51:9:1861; B § 279; BH § 2620; C § 2690; RL § 1065; NCL § 1523]—(NRS R 1959, 418; reenacted 1960, 324; A 2013, 2173)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2017–2020 · leading case: Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Maplewood Springs Homeowners Ass'n, 238 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (D. Nev. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Maplewood Springs Homeowners Ass'n, 238 F. Supp. 3d 1257 (D. Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (1). “In other words, a later-obtained interest can prevail over an earlier-obtained interest where the later purchaser has no knowledge of the previous interest and records his interest first.”
Abet Just. LLC v. First Am. Tr. Servicing Solutions, LLC, 237 F. Supp. 3d 1059 (D. Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (1). In other words, a later-obtained interest can prevail over an earlier-obtained interest where the later purchaser has no knowledge of the previous interest and records his/her interest first.”
Green Tree Servicing LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 237 F. Supp. 3d 1068 (D. Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (1). In other words, a later-obtained interest can prevail over an earlier-obtained interest where the later purchaser has no knowledge of the previous interest and records his/her interest first.”
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Spring Mountain Ranch Master Ass'n (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 2× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (1). 1 A party has constructive notice of any recorded property interest regardless of whether it 2 actually searched the real property records.”
fhlmc/freddie Mac v. T-Shack, Inc. (9th Cir. 2020). “See Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 111.180 , 111.325. T-Shack’s argument is based upon the flawed premise that Freddie Mac’s interest was unrecorded.”
fnma/fannie Mae v. Bfp Investments 4 LLC (9th Cir. 2020). “See Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 111.180 , 111.325. BFP had notice of an adverse interest in the property because the deed of trust was recorded in the name of Fannie Mae’s agent—its former servicer—at the time of the foreclosure sale.”
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1838 (9th Cir. 2020). “Saticoy Bay’s remaining arguments, including its contention that it is a bona fide purchaser, see Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 111.180 , 111.325, do not require a different result.”
Rh Kids, LLC v. Carrington Mortg. Servs. (9th Cir. 2020). “See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.180 (1); see also Bailey v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.