Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 112 - FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS (UNIFORM ACT)

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210

Rights of creditor in action for relief against transfer or obligation

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 112.210  Rights of creditor in action for relief against transfer or obligation.

      1.  In an action for relief against a transfer or obligation under this chapter, a creditor, subject to the limitations in NRS 112.220, may obtain:

      (a) Avoidance of the transfer or obligation to the extent necessary to satisfy the creditor’s claim;

      (b) An attachment or garnishment against the asset transferred or other property of the transferee pursuant to NRS 31.010 to 31.460, inclusive; and

      (c) Subject to applicable principles of equity and in accordance with applicable rules of civil procedure:

             (1) An injunction against further disposition by the debtor or a transferee, or both, of the asset transferred or of other property;

             (2) Appointment of a receiver to take charge of the asset transferred or of other property of the transferee; or

             (3) Any other relief the circumstances may require.

      2.  If a creditor has obtained a judgment on a claim against the debtor, the creditor, if the court so orders, may levy execution on the asset transferred or its proceeds.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 12)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: SUPERPUMPER, INC. VS. LEONARD
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SUPERPUMPER, INC. VS. LEONARD (2021) nev · cites it 4× “" NRS 112.210(1)(a). And 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1) provides that a "trustee may avoid any transfer of an interest of the debtor in property.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nevapp · cites it 2× “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Morgan Stanley High Yield Securities Inc v. Jecklin (2020) nvd · cites it 11× “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210 . 1 Plaintiffs argue the Court’s order and judgment explicitly awarded Plaintiffs attorneys’ 2 fees, and the award was authorized by NRS § 112.”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev · cites it 10× “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nev · cites it 4× “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Trina Solar US, Inc. v. Carson-Selman (2020) nvd · cites it 4× “Second, there were fraudulent transfers between JRC, Carson, 25 his ex-wife Jolene, and Limelight Trust to avoid payment of Trina’s judgment against JRC in 26 violation of Nevada’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210 . (Id. at 27 ¶¶ 57–65).”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev · cites it 5× “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev · cites it 5× “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney (2023) nev · cites it 2× “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 21 joy [YT eRe Court OF APPEALS OF Nevapa tO D7 tino transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210(1) — 3 cases
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev “See NRS 112.210; NRS 112.220(2). Nevada law does not create a legal cause of action for damages in excess of the value of the property to be recovered.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210(1)(a) — 4 cases
SUPERPUMPER, INC. VS. LEONARD (2021) nev “" NRS 112.210(1)(a). And 11 U.S.C. § 544(b)(1) provides that a "trustee may avoid any transfer of an interest of the debtor in property.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nevapp “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nev “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney (2023) nev “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 21 joy [YT eRe Court OF APPEALS OF Nevapa tO D7 tino transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210(1)(c)(3) — 1 case
Morgan Stanley High Yield Securities Inc v. Jecklin (2020) nvd “” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210 . 1 Plaintiffs argue the Court’s order and judgment explicitly awarded Plaintiffs attorneys’ 2 fees, and the award was authorized by NRS § 112.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.210(2) — 3 cases
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nevapp “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney, Ltd. (2023) nev “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVA DA 21 II I Y47H c:o milat transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Holland v. Anthony L. Barney (2023) nev “When the creditor seeks a remedy for a fraudulent COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 21 joy [YT eRe Court OF APPEALS OF Nevapa tO D7 tino transfer under NRS 112.210(1)(a), the district court may void the transfer and return the title to the debtor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.