Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 112 - FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (2026)

Limitation of actions; exception for spendthrift trusts

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 112.230  Limitation of actions; exception for spendthrift trusts.

      1.  A claim for relief with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under this chapter is extinguished unless action is brought:

      (a) Under paragraph (a) of subsection 1 of NRS 112.180, within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered by the claimant;

      (b) Under paragraph (b) of subsection 1 of NRS 112.180 or subsection 1 of NRS 112.190, within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or

      (c) Under subsection 2 of NRS 112.190, within 1 year after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred.

      2.  This section does not apply to a claim for relief with respect to a transfer of property to a spendthrift trust subject to chapter 166 of NRS.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 13; A 1999, 1239; 2015, 1423)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Finn v. All. Bank, 838 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Finn v. All. Bank, 838 N.W.2d 585 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). “§ 36-710 (2008); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 112.230 (2011); N.H.Rev.Stat.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 19× “30 Bock argues that this was error31 because, under Nevada law, 14 recordation of a deed does not constitute constructive notice to creditors of an allegedly 15 16 17 18 19 28 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). 20 29 Nev.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 16× “170(1)(a), Nevada’s Spendthrift Trust statute, or 15 NRS § 112.230, Nevada’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.”
Winkler (D. Nev. 2026). · cites it 7× “NRS 112.230. The limitations 14 provided are as follows: 15 1.”
GW Grundbesitz AG v. Gunn (D. Nev. 2023). · cites it 6× “]” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). The two transfers at issue in this case occurred on 2 the same day: July 27, 2016.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2021). · cites it 4× “15 But even were Bock’s fraudulent-transfer claims barred under the Nevada statute of 16 limitations, those claims sufficiently “arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set 17 18 19 17 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). 20 18 ECF No.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 3× “In their Reply, 13 Defendants make clear that even if the Court were to find the Trust at issue was not a spendthrift 14 trust, Plaintiff’s claims fail under NRS 112.230. ECF No. 20. 15 In its Motion to Strike, Plaintiff avers that Defendants’ argument in Reply in Support of…”
Snow Covered Capital, LLC v. Fonfa (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 2× “NRS 112.230(1)(a) governs fraudulent-transfer claims generally, 20 requiring that claims be brought “within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation 21 was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably 22 have been…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230(1) — 2 cases
GW Grundbesitz AG v. Gunn (D. Nev. 2023). “]” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). The two transfers at issue in this case occurred on 2 the same day: July 27, 2016.”
Winkler (D. Nev. 2026). “NRS 112.230. The limitations 14 provided are as follows: 15 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230(1)(a) — 5 cases
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). “30 Bock argues that this was error31 because, under Nevada law, 14 recordation of a deed does not constitute constructive notice to creditors of an allegedly 15 16 17 18 19 28 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). 20 29 Nev.”
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2021). “15 But even were Bock’s fraudulent-transfer claims barred under the Nevada statute of 16 limitations, those claims sufficiently “arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set 17 18 19 17 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). 20 18 ECF No.”
GW Grundbesitz AG v. Gunn (D. Nev. 2023). “]” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230 (1)(a). The two transfers at issue in this case occurred on 2 the same day: July 27, 2016.”
Snow Covered Capital, LLC v. Fonfa (D. Nev. 2024). “NRS 112.230(1)(a) governs fraudulent-transfer claims generally, 20 requiring that claims be brought “within 4 years after the transfer was made or the obligation 21 was incurred or, if later, within 1 year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably 22 have been…”
Winkler (D. Nev. 2026). “NRS 112.230. The limitations 14 provided are as follows: 15 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230(1)(b) — 1 case
Winkler (D. Nev. 2026). “NRS 112.230. The limitations 14 provided are as follows: 15 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 112.230(2) — 1 case
Bock, LLC v. Steelman (D. Nev. 2020). “170(1)(a), Nevada’s Spendthrift Trust statute, or 15 NRS § 112.230, Nevada’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.