Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.340 (2026)

Transient commercial use of units within certain planned communities

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 116.340  Transient commercial use of units within certain planned communities.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, a person who owns, or directly or indirectly has an interest in, one or more units within a planned community that are restricted to residential use by the declaration may use that unit or one of those units for a transient commercial use only if:

      (a) The governing documents of the association and any master association do not prohibit such use;

      (b) The executive board of the association and any master association approve the transient commercial use of the unit, except that such approval is not required if the planned community and one or more hotels are subject to the governing documents of a master association and those governing documents do not prohibit such use; and

      (c) The unit is properly zoned for the transient commercial use and any license required by the local government for the transient commercial use is obtained.

      2.  A declarant who owns, or directly or indirectly has an interest in, one or more units within a planned community under the governing documents of the association that are restricted to residential use by the declaration may use that unit or those units for a transient commercial use during the period that the declarant is offering units for sale within the planned community if such use complies with the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (c) of subsection 1.

      3.  The association and any master association may establish requirements for the transient commercial use of a unit pursuant to the provisions of this section, including, without limitation, the payment of additional fees that are related to any increase in services or other costs associated with the transient commercial use of the unit.

      4.  As used in this section:

      (a) “Remuneration” means any compensation, money, rent or other valuable consideration given in return for the occupancy, possession or use of a unit.

      (b) “Transient commercial use” means the use of a unit, for remuneration, as a hostel, hotel, inn, motel, resort, vacation rental or other form of transient lodging if the term of the occupancy, possession or use of the unit is for less than 30 consecutive calendar days.

      (Added to NRS by 2003, 2219; A 2009, 1101)—(Substituted in revision for NRS 116.31123)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Elk Point CC HOA v. K.J. Brown, LLC, 2022 NV 60 (Nev. 2022).
Elk Point CC HOA v. K.J. Brown, LLC, 2022 NV 60 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 12× “EPCC argues that the district court's interpretation that the Bylaws preclude short-term rentals by restricting the property to "single family residential purposes only" conflicts with NRS 116.340(1), which allows individuals in planned communities to engage in short-term rental…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.340(1) — 1 case
Elk Point CC HOA v. K.J. Brown, LLC, 2022 NV 60 (Nev. 2022). “EPCC argues that the district court's interpretation that the Bylaws preclude short-term rentals by restricting the property to "single family residential purposes only" conflicts with NRS 116.340(1), which allows individuals in planned communities to engage in short-term rental…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.340(1)(a) — 1 case
Elk Point CC HOA v. K.J. Brown, LLC, 2022 NV 60 (Nev. 2022). “EPCC argues that the district court's interpretation that the Bylaws preclude short-term rentals by restricting the property to "single family residential purposes only" conflicts with NRS 116.340(1), which allows individuals in planned communities to engage in short-term rental…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.340(4)(b) — 1 case
Elk Point CC HOA v. K.J. Brown, LLC, 2022 NV 60 (Nev. 2022). “EPCC argues that the district court's interpretation that the Bylaws preclude short-term rentals by restricting the property to "single family residential purposes only" conflicts with NRS 116.340(1), which allows individuals in planned communities to engage in short-term rental…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.