Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 123A - PREMARITAL AGREEMENTS (UNIFORM ACT)
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.040 (2026)

Formalities

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 123A.040  Formalities.  A premarital agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. It is enforceable without consideration.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 1003)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.050(1)(d). The burden of proving the unenforceability of a premarital agreement is on the party challenging the agreement.”
Grisham v. Grisham, 289 P.3d 230 (Nev. 2012). “” See also NRS 123A.040 (requiring a premarital agreement to be written and signed but not requiring acknowledgment).”
Fick v. Fick, 851 P.2d 445 (Nev. 1993). “NRS 123A.040. A premarital agreement may, among other things, eliminate alimony.”
Lopez v. Lopez, 541 P.3d 117 (Nev. 2023). “NRS 123A.040 requires a premarital agreement to be in writing and signed by both parties.”
Lopez v. Lopez (Nev. 2023). “NRS 123A.040 requires a premarital agreement to be in writing and signed by both parties.”
Lopez v. Lopez (Nev. 2023). “NRS 123A.040 requires a premarital agreement to be in writing and signed by both parties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.