Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.050 (2026)

Content

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 123A.050  Content.

      1.  Parties to a premarital agreement may contract with respect to:

      (a) The rights and obligations of each of the parties in any of the property of either or both of them whenever and wherever acquired or located;

      (b) The right to buy, sell, use, transfer, exchange, abandon, lease, consume, expend, assign, create a security interest in, mortgage, encumber, dispose of, or otherwise manage and control property;

      (c) The disposition of property upon separation, marital dissolution, death, or the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event;

      (d) The modification or elimination of alimony or support or maintenance of a spouse;

      (e) The making of a will, trust or other arrangement to carry out the provisions of the agreement;

      (f) The ownership rights in and disposition of the death benefit from a life insurance policy;

      (g) The choice of law governing the construction of the agreement; and

      (h) Any other matter, including their personal rights and obligations, not in violation of public policy or a statute imposing a criminal penalty.

      2.  The right of a child to support may not be adversely affected by a premarital agreement.

      (Added to NRS by 1989, 1003)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1993–2018 · leading case: Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018).
Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018). · cites it 2× “3d at 830 (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.080 ). "A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that": (a) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; (b) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed; or (c)…”
Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John Erpelding, 917 N.W.2d 235 (Iowa 2018). “(2017)); Nevada, Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 123A.050(1)(d) (West, Westlaw through 2017 Reg.”
In Re Marriage of Pendleton & Fireman, 5 P.3d 839 (Cal. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 42-1004); Nevada (Nev.Rev.Stat. § 123A.050); New Jersey (N.”
Fick v. Fick, 851 P.2d 445 (Nev. 1993). “NRS 123A.050. However, a prenuptial agreement is unenforceable if it was unconscionable at execution, involuntarily signed, or the parties did not fully disclose their assets and obligations before the agreement’s execution.”
Jones v. Jones, Jr. (Nev. 2016). “" NRS 123A.050(1)(h). Furthermore, a prenuptial agreement is enforceable so long as it was executed voluntarily and was not unconscionable when executed.”
Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John Erpelding, 911 N.W.2d 397 (Iowa 2018). “(2017)); Nevada, Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 123A.050(1)(d) (West, Westlaw through 2017 Reg.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.050(1)(d) — 3 cases
Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John Erpelding, 917 N.W.2d 235 (Iowa 2018). “(2017)); Nevada, Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 123A.050(1)(d) (West, Westlaw through 2017 Reg.”
Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018). “3d at 830 (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.080 ). "A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that": (a) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; (b) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed; or (c)…”
Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John Erpelding, 911 N.W.2d 397 (Iowa 2018). “(2017)); Nevada, Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 123A.050(1)(d) (West, Westlaw through 2017 Reg.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.050(1)(g) — 1 case
Hutchins v. Hutchins, 430 P.3d 502 (Mont. 2018). “3d at 830 (citing Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.080 ). "A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that": (a) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; (b) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed; or (c)…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 123A.050(1)(h) — 1 case
Jones v. Jones, Jr. (Nev. 2016). “" NRS 123A.050(1)(h). Furthermore, a prenuptial agreement is enforceable so long as it was executed voluntarily and was not unconscionable when executed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.