Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125D.150 (2026)

Orders and petitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125D.150  Orders and petitions.

      1.  A court on its own motion may order abduction prevention measures in a child custody proceeding if the court finds that the evidence establishes a credible risk of abduction of the child.

      2.  A party to a child custody determination or another individual or entity having a right pursuant to the law of this State or any other state to seek a child custody determination for the child may file a petition seeking abduction prevention measures to protect the child pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.

      3.  A district attorney or the Attorney General acting pursuant to NRS 125A.565 may seek a warrant to take physical custody of a child pursuant to NRS 125D.200 or other appropriate abduction prevention measures.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 233)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Davis Vs. Ewalefo (child Custody), 2015 NV 45 (Nev. 2015).
Davis Vs. Ewalefo (child Custody), 2015 NV 45 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “" NRS 125D.150(1). This Act articulates the factors a district court should consider in making such a determination, NRS 125D.”
Davis Vs. Ewalefo (child Custody), 2015 NV 45 (Nev. 2015). “" NRS 125D.150(1). This Act articulates the factors a district court should consider in making such a determination, NRS 125D.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125D.150(1) — 2 cases
Davis Vs. Ewalefo (child Custody), 2015 NV 45 (Nev. 2015). “" NRS 125D.150(1). This Act articulates the factors a district court should consider in making such a determination, NRS 125D.”
Davis Vs. Ewalefo (child Custody), 2015 NV 45 (Nev. 2015). “" NRS 125D.150(1). This Act articulates the factors a district court should consider in making such a determination, NRS 125D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.