NRS
133.080 Foreign execution.
1. Except as otherwise provided in chapter 133A of NRS, if in writing and
subscribed by the testator, a last will and testament executed outside this
State in the manner prescribed by the law, either of the state where executed
or of the testator’s domicile, shall be deemed to be legally executed, and is
of the same force and effect as if executed in the manner prescribed by the law
of this State.
2. This section must be so interpreted and
construed as to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law of those
states which enact it.
3. As used in this section, “subscribed”
includes, without limitation, placing an electronic signature on an electronic
will.
[1:36:1915; 1919 RL p. 3373; NCL § 9929] +
[2:36:1915; 1919 RL p. 3374; NCL § 9930]—(NRS A 1999,
2256; 2001,
2343; 2009,
250)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case:
In re Est. of Sweet, 2022 NV 68 (Nev. 2022).
In re Est. of Sweet, 2022 NV 68 (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 40× “The only notable difference between the hearings was that there was discussion before the court as to whether the will was valid under NRS 133.080 (foreign execution of wills) and no discussion as to NRS 133.”
In re Est. of Sweet (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 20× “The only notable difference between the hearings was that there was discussion before the court as to whether the will was valid under NRS 133.080 (foreign execution of wills) and no discussion as to NRS 133.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 133.080(1) — 2 cases
In re Est. of Sweet, 2022 NV 68 (Nev. 2022).
“The only notable difference between the hearings was that there was discussion before the court as to whether the will was valid under NRS 133.080 (foreign execution of wills) and no discussion as to NRS 133.”
In re Est. of Sweet (Nev. 2022).
“The only notable difference between the hearings was that there was discussion before the court as to whether the will was valid under NRS 133.080 (foreign execution of wills) and no discussion as to NRS 133.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.