Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 148 - SALES, CONVEYANCES AND EXCHANGES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 148.070 (2026)

Written objection: Hearing; proof of notice

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 148.070  Written objection: Hearing; proof of notice.  An interested person may file written objections to the confirmation of the sale and may be heard thereon, and may produce witnesses in support of the objections. Before an order is made confirming a sale, it must be proved to the satisfaction of the court that notice of the sale was given as prescribed by this chapter, and the order of confirmation must show that such proof was made.

      [141:107:1941; 1931 NCL § 9882.141]—(NRS A 1999, 2316)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1966–1986 · leading case: Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 409 P.2d 627 (Nev. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. Leverton, 409 P.2d 627 (Nev. 1966). · cites it 3× “NRS 148.070 provides: “Any person interested in the estate may file written objections to the confirmation of the sale and *9 may be heard thereon * * *.”
A-Mark Coin Co., Inc. v. Redfield's Est., 582 P.2d 359 (Nev. 1978). · cites it 4× “170 is made, because the statute was designed to prevent delay and resultant damage to an estate if executors could not quickly sell certain types of personal property.”
Balaban v. Bank of Nevada, 477 P.2d 860 (Nev. 1970). “NRS 148.070 provides that, “Any person interested in the estate may file written objections to the confirmation of the sale and may be heard thereon, and may produce witnesses in support of his objections.”
Washoe Broad. Co. v. Neuhoff, 726 P.2d 338 (Nev. 1986). · cites it 2× “2 In this regard, appellant asks us to compare the language used in NRS 148.070, which specifically limits those who may file an objection to the confirmation of the sale of an estate asset to those “person[s] interested in the estate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.