Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 16 - DATE OF TRIAL; TRIAL BY JURY; MASTERS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 16.100 (2026)

Jury may view property or premises

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 16.100  Jury may view property or premises.  When, in the opinion of the court, it is proper for the jury to have a view of the property which is the subject of litigation, or of the place in which any material fact occurred, it may order them to be conducted, in a body, under the charge of an officer, to the place, which shall be shown to them by some person appointed by the court for that purpose. While the jury are thus absent, no person, other than the person so appointed, shall speak to them on any subject connected with the trial.

      [1911 CPA § 269; RL § 5211; NCL § 8767]

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1967–1968 · leading case: Eikelberger v. State ex rel. Dep't of Highways, 429 P.2d 555 (Nev. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Eikelberger v. State ex rel. Dep't of Highways, 429 P.2d 555 (Nev. 1967). “We hold only that here, the witness was not shown to possess essential information *310 about the relevant capitalization rate for the investment risk involved. 4 He may have been competent, but the questioning did not reveal the foundation to establish competency.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Highways v. Haapanen, 448 P.2d 703 (Nev. 1968). “On appeal the state assigned as error the refusal of the trial court to allow a jury view, the admission of testimony that the landowner had an offer of purchase prior to the taking, and the refusal of the trial court to allow the jury to consider site prominence and increase of…”
Eikelberger v. State, Dep't of Highways, 429 P.2d 555 (Nev. 1967). “We hold only that here, the witness was not shown to possess essential information about the relevant capitalization rate for the investment risk involved.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.