Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285 (2026)

Enforcement of right of contribution

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 17.285  Enforcement of right of contribution.

      1.  Whether or not judgment has been entered in an action against two or more tortfeasors for the same injury or wrongful death, contribution may be enforced by separate action.

      2.  Where a judgment has been entered in an action against two or more tortfeasors for the same injury or wrongful death, contribution may be enforced in that action by judgment in favor of one against other judgment defendants by motion upon notice to all parties to the action.

      3.  If there is a judgment for the injury or wrongful death against the tortfeasor seeking contribution, any separate action by the tortfeasor to enforce contribution must be commenced within 1 year after the judgment has become final by lapse of time for appeal or after appellate review.

      4.  If there is no judgment for the injury or wrongful death against the tortfeasor seeking contribution, the tortfeasor’s right of contribution is barred unless the tortfeasor has:

      (a) Discharged by payment the common liability within the statute of limitations period applicable to claimant’s right of action against him or her and has commenced an action for contribution within 1 year after payment; or

      (b) Agreed while action is pending against him or her to discharge the common liability and has within 1 year after the agreement paid the liability and commenced an action for contribution.

      5.  The judgment of the court in determining the liability of the several defendants to the claimant for an injury or wrongful death shall be binding as among such defendants in determining their right to contribution.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 1304)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1992–2020 · leading case: Pack v. Latourette, 277 P.3d 1246 (Nev. 2012).
Pack v. Latourette, 277 P.3d 1246 (Nev. 2012). · cites it 4× “190(2)(c) and NRS 17.285, respectively. Id. at 95 , 225 P.”
Saylor v. Arcotta, 225 P.3d 1276 (Nev. 2010). · cites it 5× “190(2)(c), while claims for contribution are subject to the limitations period prescribed by NRS 17.285. Because no judgment has been entered in the case at hand, and thus the applicable statutes of limitations have not yet begun to run, we reverse the district court’s summary…”
The Doctors Co. v. Vincent, 98 P.3d 681 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “245(l)(a) and NRS 17.285(4) reinforce this conclusion. NRS 17.”
Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc. Vs. Cash, 2020 NV 88 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 4× “" NRS 17.285(4)(b). A right of contribution is present where there is an injury for which two persons are jointly or severally liable, regardless of whether the tortious conduct may be characterized as successive.”
Mirch v. Frank, 295 F. Supp. 2d 1180 (D. Nev. 2003). · cites it 2× “We do not comment on whether Mirch can later bring a separate action for contribution under Nevada Revised Statute Section 17.285.”
Bell & Gossett Co. v. Oak Grove Investors, 843 P.2d 351 (Nev. 1992). · cites it 3× “In Nevada, enforcement of a tortfeasor’s right to contribution from other tortfeasors is governed by NRS 17.285, which (in relevant part) provides: 1.”
Balodimas, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc.) (Nev. 2017). · cites it 2× “However, NRS 17.285(4)(a) provides a one-year statute of limitations for contribution after settlement with a claimant, and this court has held that a contribution claim under NRS 17.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(1) — 1 case
Pack v. Latourette, 277 P.3d 1246 (Nev. 2012). “190(2)(c) and NRS 17.285, respectively. Id. at 95 , 225 P.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(2) — 2 cases
Saylor v. Arcotta, 225 P.3d 1276 (Nev. 2010). “190(2)(c), while claims for contribution are subject to the limitations period prescribed by NRS 17.285. Because no judgment has been entered in the case at hand, and thus the applicable statutes of limitations have not yet begun to run, we reverse the district court’s summary…”
Bell & Gossett Co. v. Oak Grove Investors, 843 P.2d 351 (Nev. 1992). “In Nevada, enforcement of a tortfeasor’s right to contribution from other tortfeasors is governed by NRS 17.285, which (in relevant part) provides: 1.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(3) — 1 case
Saylor v. Arcotta, 225 P.3d 1276 (Nev. 2010). “190(2)(c), while claims for contribution are subject to the limitations period prescribed by NRS 17.285. Because no judgment has been entered in the case at hand, and thus the applicable statutes of limitations have not yet begun to run, we reverse the district court’s summary…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(4) — 1 case
The Doctors Co. v. Vincent, 98 P.3d 681 (Nev. 2004). “245(l)(a) and NRS 17.285(4) reinforce this conclusion. NRS 17.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(4)(a) — 1 case
Balodimas, M.D. v. Dist. Ct. (Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc.) (Nev. 2017). “However, NRS 17.285(4)(a) provides a one-year statute of limitations for contribution after settlement with a claimant, and this court has held that a contribution claim under NRS 17.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.285(4)(b) — 1 case
Repub. Silver State Disposal, Inc. Vs. Cash, 2020 NV 88 (Nev. 2020). “" NRS 17.285(4)(b). A right of contribution is present where there is an injury for which two persons are jointly or severally liable, regardless of whether the tortious conduct may be characterized as successive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.