Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 173.105 (2026)
Charging defendant by fictitious or erroneous name: Insertion of true name
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 173.105 Charging defendant by fictitious or erroneous name: Insertion of
true name. When a defendant is
charged by a fictitious or erroneous name, and in any stage of the proceedings
the defendant’s true name is discovered, it must be inserted in the subsequent
proceedings referring to the fact of the defendant’s being charged by the name
mentioned in the indictment or information.
(Added to NRS by 1967, 1413)
JOINDER OF OFFENSES AND OF DEFENDANTS
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2021 · leading case: Franklin v. State, 513 P.2d 1252 (Nev. 1973).
Franklin v. State, 513 P.2d 1252 (Nev. 1973). “Such a challenge to the validity of the grand jury proceedings is properly made by motion (NRS 173.105(1)) and not by pretrial habeas corpus proceedings.”
Sykes v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't of Clark Cnty. Nevada (D. Nev. 2021). “§§ 1341 ; 1343 and NRS 173.105 against Officer Hunt and Doe Sergeant.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 173.105(1) — 1 case
Franklin v. State, 513 P.2d 1252 (Nev. 1973). “Such a challenge to the validity of the grand jury proceedings is properly made by motion (NRS 173.105(1)) and not by pretrial habeas corpus proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.