Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 177 - APPEALS AND REMEDIES AFTER CONVICTION

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 177.045

Intermediate order or proceeding may be reviewed on appeal

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 177.045  Intermediate order or proceeding may be reviewed on appeal.  Upon the appeal, any decision of the court in an intermediate order or proceeding, forming a part of the record, may be reviewed.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1444)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 73 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1969–2022 · leading case: Molina v. State
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Molina v. State (2004) nev “NRS 177.045; Lee v. State, 115 Nev. 207, 210 , 985 P.”
State v. Babayan (1990) nev · cites it 2× “6 Respondent Babayan also asks, pursuant to NRS 177.045, that we review two district court orders — one by Judge Bowen and the other by Judge Schouweiler — in which the courts held that the parents’ testimony regarding statements by the alleged victims were admissible as…”
Hargrove v. State (1984) nev “…withdrawal would be reviewable on direct appeal from the judgment as an intermediate order in the proceedings. See NRS 177.045.”
State v. Lewis (2008) nev · cites it 2× “See NRS 177.045. We note that NRS 177.015(2) authorizes independent appellate review of an intermediate order under specific, limited circumstances not applicable here.”
Mazzan v. Warden, Nevada State Prison (1996) nev “NRS 177.045 (upon appeal from a conviction, decisions in intermediate orders or proceedings may be reviewed).”
Clay v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “See NRS 177.045. Nonetheless, that remedy may not be adequate because any error in the grand-jury proceeding is likely to be harmless after a conviction.”
Lisle v. State (1998) nev “See NRS 177.045 (any decision in an intermediate order or proceeding may be reviewed on appeal from the final judgment); see also Johnston v.”
Gonzalez v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “015; NRS 177.045, that remedy is not adequate to protect the right afforded by the Double Jeopardy Clause—to not be placed twice in jeopardy.”
Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “015(3), and seek review of the district court’s pretrial order as an intermediate order, NRS 177.045. See generally Lisle v. State, 114 Nev.”
Brown v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev. (2017) nev “Despite the availability of a remedy at law by way of an appeal should Brown be convicted, see NRS 177.045, we elect to exercise our discretion and consider the petition for a writ of mandamus in the interest of judicial economy and in order to control a manifest abuse or…”
State v. Shade (1994) nev “” NRS 177.045. The appeal from the order of the district court granting Shade’s motion to dismiss may now proceed.”
Cook v. State (1969) nev “380(3) and (4)] and the trial delayed until the appeal is determined since the appellate issue would directly bear upon the innocence or guilt of the accused. 1 On the other hand, if the state is correct in its contention, a review of the ruling of the district court may be…”
Show all 73 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.