Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 177 - APPEALS AND REMEDIES AFTER CONVICTION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 177.145 (2026)

Application for relief pending review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 177.145  Application for relief pending review.  If application is made to a district court, the Court of Appeals or a justice of the Supreme Court for bail pending appeal or for an extension of time for filing the record on appeal or for any other relief which might have been granted by the trial court, the application shall be upon notice and shall show that:

      1.  Application to the court below or a judge thereof is not practicable;

      2.  Application has been made and denied, with the reasons given for the denial; or

      3.  The action on the application did not afford the relief to which the applicant considers himself or herself to be entitled.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1445; A 2013, 1760)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1970–2018 · leading case: Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004). “21 Pursuant to NRS 177.145(2), such an application in this court must be upon notice to the opposing party and “shall” show that “[ajpplication has been made [to the district court] and denied, with the reasons given for the denial.”
In Re Austin, 477 P.2d 873 (Nev. 1970). · cites it 2× “The 1967 amendment [3] (NRS 177.145) also required: "If application is made to a district court or to a justice of the supreme court for bail pending appeal or for an extension of time for filing the record on appeal or for any other relief which might have been granted by the…”
Porter v. Dist Ct. (State) (Nev. 2018). “See NRS 177.145. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.”
McCallister (Donald) v. State (Nev. 2018). “; see also NRS 177.145. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction as to the denial of those motions.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 177.145(2) — 1 case
Bergna v. State, 102 P.3d 549 (Nev. 2004). “21 Pursuant to NRS 177.145(2), such an application in this court must be upon notice to the opposing party and “shall” show that “[ajpplication has been made [to the district court] and denied, with the reasons given for the denial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.