Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 197.090 (2026)
Interfering with public officer
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 197.090 Interfering with public officer. Except
under circumstances where a greater penalty is provided in NRS 200.481, any person who, by means of
any threat, force or violence, attempts to deter or prevent any executive or
administrative officer from performing any duty imposed upon the officer by
law, or who knowingly resists by force or violence any executive or
administrative officer in the performance of the officer’s duty, is guilty of a
gross misdemeanor.
[1911 C&P § 64; RL § 6329; NCL § 10013]—(NRS A 1981, 11)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1969–2025 · leading case: State v. Javier C., 289 P.3d 1194 (Nev. 2012).
State v. Javier C., 289 P.3d 1194 (Nev. 2012). “485, a person convicted of a battery, other than a battery committed by an adult upon a child which constitutes child abuse, shall be punished: (a) If the battery is not committed with a deadly weapon, and no substantial bodily harm to the victim results, except under…”
Colle v. State, 454 P.2d 21 (Nev. 1969). “: John Ernest Colle was tried by jury and convicted of interfering with a public officer in the performance of his duty, a violation of NRS 197.090, 1 which offense is a gross misdemeanor.”
Colle v. State, 455 P.2d 917 (Nev. 1969). “Colle had been earlier tried and convicted in the district court for a violation of NRS 197.090 (interfering with a police officer in the performance of his duties), which offense is a gross misdemeanor.”
Anderson (D. Nev. 2025). “officer from performing any duty 16 imposed upon the officer by law, or who knowingly resists by force or violence any 17 executive .”
LaChance v. Wickham (D. Nev. 2021). “Consequently, 1 under circumstances where a greater penalty is provided in this section or NRS 197.090, for a misdemeanor. 2 (b) If the battery is not committed with a deadly weapon, and 3 either substantial bodily harm to the victim results or the battery is committed by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.