Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 200 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690 (2026)

Penalties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 200.690  Penalties.

      1.  A person who willfully and knowingly violates NRS 200.620 to 200.650, inclusive:

      (a) Shall be punished for a category D felony as provided in NRS 193.130.

      (b) Is liable to a person whose wire or oral communication is intercepted without his or her consent for:

             (1) Actual damages or liquidated damages of $100 per day of violation but not less than $1,000, whichever is greater;

             (2) Punitive damages; and

             (3) His or her costs reasonably incurred in the action, including a reasonable attorney’s fee,

Ê all of which may be recovered by civil action.

      2.  A good faith reliance by a public utility on a written request for interception by one party to a conversation is a complete defense to any civil or criminal action brought against the public utility on account of the interception.

      (Added to NRS by 1957, 336; A 1967, 474; 1973, 1749; 1995, 1195)

CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE MATERIAL

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998). · cites it 6× “620 through NRS 200.690, in order to bring Nevada law somewhat in conformity with federal wiretap statutes.”
Lyudmyla Pyankovska v. Sean Abid, 65 F.4th 1067 (9th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 2520 (a); see Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690 (similar). “Appropriate relief” in a federal civil case includes equitable relief, damages, punitive damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and “other litigation costs.”
Baker v. Apttus Corp. (D. Nev. 2020). · cites it 7× “690 because she was in Europe—not 10 Nevada—at the time and also that she did not possess the requisite mental state to violate 11 §200.”
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 6× “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 3× “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Ditech Fin., LLC Vs. Buckles, 2017 NV 64 (Nev. 2017). “' 1 NRS 200.690(1)(b) provides a private right of action against "[a] person who willfully and knowingly violates NRS 200.”
Ditech Fin., LLC Vs. Buckles, 2017 NV 64 (Nev. 2017). “' 1 NRS 200.690(1)(b) provides a private right of action against "[a] person who willfully and knowingly violates NRS 200.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(1) — 2 cases
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(1)(a) — 2 cases
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(1)(b) — 5 cases
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Baker v. Apttus Corp. (D. Nev. 2020). “690 because she was in Europe—not 10 Nevada—at the time and also that she did not possess the requisite mental state to violate 11 §200.”
Ditech Fin., LLC Vs. Buckles, 2017 NV 64 (Nev. 2017). “' 1 NRS 200.690(1)(b) provides a private right of action against "[a] person who willfully and knowingly violates NRS 200.”
Abid Vs. Abid (child Custody), 2017 NV 94 (Nev. 2017). “See NRS 200.690(1) (enforcing NRS 200.650 exclusively with criminal prosecution and civil damages).”
Ditech Fin., LLC Vs. Buckles, 2017 NV 64 (Nev. 2017). “' 1 NRS 200.690(1)(b) provides a private right of action against "[a] person who willfully and knowingly violates NRS 200.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(1)(b)(1) — 1 case
Baker v. Apttus Corp. (D. Nev. 2020). “690 because she was in Europe—not 10 Nevada—at the time and also that she did not possess the requisite mental state to violate 11 §200.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(a) — 1 case
Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998). “620 through NRS 200.690, in order to bring Nevada law somewhat in conformity with federal wiretap statutes.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(b) — 1 case
Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998). “620 through NRS 200.690, in order to bring Nevada law somewhat in conformity with federal wiretap statutes.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(l)(a) — 1 case
Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998). “620 through NRS 200.690, in order to bring Nevada law somewhat in conformity with federal wiretap statutes.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690(l)(b) — 1 case
Lane v. Allstate Ins., 969 P.2d 938 (Nev. 1998). “620 through NRS 200.690, in order to bring Nevada law somewhat in conformity with federal wiretap statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.