Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 200 - CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.720 (2026)

Promotion of sexual performance of minor unlawful

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 200.720  Promotion of sexual performance of minor unlawful.  A person who knowingly promotes a performance of a minor:

      1.  Where the minor engages in or simulates, or assists others to engage in or simulate, sexual conduct; or

      2.  Where the minor is the subject of a sexual portrayal,

Ê is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 200.750.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 814; A 1995, 951, 1196, 1337)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2022 · leading case: Sena (christopher) v. State, 2022 NV 34 (Nev. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sena (christopher) v. State, 2022 NV 34 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “Further, because there was sufficient evidence to support Sena's convictions under the "sexual portrayal" portion of NRS 200.720(2), we need not 17It is not clear from our review of the record whether the still images (exhibits 79 and 81) taken from the videos were extracted by…”
Castaneda (anthony) Vs. State, 2016 NV 44 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “710 and NRS 200.720, to SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 7 « 1947 « e mean "any play, film, photograph, computer-generated image, electronic representation, dance or other visual presentation.”
Castaneda (anthony) Vs. State, 2016 NV 44 (Nev. 2016). “710 and NRS 200.720, to SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 7 « 1947 « e mean "any play, film, photograph, computer-generated image, electronic representation, dance or other visual presentation.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.720(2) — 1 case
Sena (christopher) v. State, 2022 NV 34 (Nev. 2022). “Further, because there was sufficient evidence to support Sena's convictions under the "sexual portrayal" portion of NRS 200.720(2), we need not 17It is not clear from our review of the record whether the still images (exhibits 79 and 81) taken from the videos were extracted by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.