NRS
200.727 Use of Internet to control visual presentation depicting sexual
conduct of person under 16 years of age; penalties.
1. Any person who, knowingly, willfully
and with the specific intent to view any film, photograph or other visual
presentation depicting a person under the age of 16 years engaging in or
simulating sexual conduct, uses the Internet to control such a film, photograph
or other visual presentation is guilty of:
(a) For the first offense, a category C felony
and shall be punished as provided in NRS
193.130.
(b) For any subsequent offense, a category B
felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum
term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, and
may be further punished by a fine of not more than $5,000.
2. As used in this section, “sexual
conduct” means sexual intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus, bestiality, anal
intercourse, excretion, sado-masochistic abuse, masturbation, or the
penetration of any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital
or anal opening of the body of another.
(Added to NRS by 2009,
2662)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 2011–2020 · leading case:
Marsh v. People, 389 P.3d 100 (Colo. 2017).
Marsh v. People, 389 P.3d 100 (Colo. 2017).
“145c(4) (West 2016) (“knowingly possesses or knowingly seeks and accesses”); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 200.727 (1) (West 2016) (“knowingly, willfully and with the specific intent to view”); N.”
State v. Hughes, 261 P.3d 1067 (Nev. 2011).
· cites it 2× “, NRS 200.727 (proscribing the use of the Internet to control a depiction of someone under the age of 16 years engaging in sexual conduct); NRS 200.”
Moore (maurice) Vs. State, 2020 NV 71 (Nev. 2020).
· cites it 2× “366 (increasing penalties for sexual assault on a child under the age of 16); NRS 200.727 (criminalizing the viewing of any visual presentation of a child under the age of 16 involved in a sexual act); NRS 200.”
Kincade (Michael) v. State (Nev. 2014).
“See NRS 200.727(1). The State presented evidence of web searches on Kincade's computer related to child pornography, child pornography found on Kincade's computer, websites relating to pornography that were manually typed into Kincade's computer, and evidence that Kincade…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.727(1) — 1 case
Kincade (Michael) v. State (Nev. 2014).
“See NRS 200.727(1). The State presented evidence of web searches on Kincade's computer related to child pornography, child pornography found on Kincade's computer, websites relating to pornography that were manually typed into Kincade's computer, and evidence that Kincade…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.