Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 21.010 (2026)

Writ of execution: Limitations of time

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 21.010 Writ of execution: Limitations of time. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 125B.050 for enforcement of a judgment for support of a child, the party in whose favor judgment is given may, at any time before the judgment expires, obtain the issuance of a writ of execution for its enforcement as prescribed in this chapter. The writ ceases to be effective when the judgment expires.

[1911 CPA § 338; RL § 5280; NCL § 8836]—(NRS A 1979, 1172; 1987, 2249; 1989, 586)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1978–2017 · leading case: Daniel v. Barengo, 585 P.2d 1348 (Nev. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Daniel v. Barengo, 585 P.2d 1348 (Nev. 1978). · cites it 7× “Nearly six years later, on November 26, 1975, appellant sought, and was issued, a writ of execution on the judgment pursuant to NRS 21.010. 1 The writ commanded the Sheriff of Washoe County to satisfy the judgment out of certain real property owned by respondent in Washoe…”

James Nalder v. United Auto. Ins. Co, 878 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2017). “UAIC also points to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 21.010 , which provides that “the party in whose favor judgment is given may, at any time before the judgment expires, obtain the issuance of a writ of execution for.”

Butwinick v. Hepner, 291 P.3d 119 (Nev. 2012). “Finally, they note that respondents have provided no authority to establish that appellants’ defenses to any underlying lawsuit are personal property subject to execution during the pendency of an appeal.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.