Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 213 - PARDONS AND PAROLES; REMISSIONS OF FINES AND COMMUTATIONS OF PUNISHMENTS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.010

State Board of Pardons Commissioners: Members; meetings; notice of meetings to victim

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 213.010  State Board of Pardons Commissioners: Members; meetings; notice of meetings to victim.

      1.  The State Board of Pardons Commissioners consists of the Governor, the justices of the Supreme Court and the Attorney General.

      2.  Meetings of the Board for the purpose of considering applications for clemency may be held semiannually or oftener, on such dates as may be fixed by the Board.

      3.  Except as otherwise provided in a policy adopted pursuant to NRS 213.035, the Board shall give written notice at least 15 days before a meeting to each victim of the crimes committed by each person whose application for clemency will be considered at the meeting, if the victim so requests in writing and provides his or her current address. If a current address is not provided, the Board may not be held responsible if the notice is not received by the victim. The victim may submit a written response to the Board at any time before the meeting. All personal information, including, but not limited to, a current or former address, which pertains to a victim and which is received by the Board pursuant to this subsection is confidential.

      [1:149:1933; 1931 NCL § 11569]—(NRS A 1957, 738; 1973, 803; 1979, 657; 1983, 1330, 1438, 1658; 1997, 3244; 2009, 775)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1974–1995 · leading case: Igbinovia v. State
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Igbinovia v. State (1995) nev · cites it 2× “That statute provides, in relevant part: As used in NRS 213.010 to 213.100 [a subsection of the "Pardons and Paroles" chapter of the NRS], inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires: 2.”
State v. Clark (1974) nev “(NRS 213.010; NRS 213.100.) That constitutional body is distinctive and separate from the parole department.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.