Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 227.230 (2026)

Directing Attorney General to prosecute suits for recovery of money due State; directing and superintending collection of money due State; exception

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 227.230  Directing Attorney General to prosecute suits for recovery of money due State; directing and superintending collection of money due State; exception.  Except as otherwise provided in chapter 353C of NRS, the State Controller shall:

      1.  Direct the Attorney General to institute and prosecute, in the name of the State, all proper suits for the recovery of any debts, money or property of the State, or for the ascertainment of any right or liability concerning the same.

      2.  Direct and superintend the collection of all money due the State.

      [7:43:1866; B § 2814; BH § 1813; C § 1961; RL § 4160; NCL § 7352]—(NRS A 1999, 3448)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 127 P.3d 1088 (Nev. 2006).
Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 127 P.3d 1088 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 2× “5, §§ 19, 22 (providing for the election of the Attorney General as part of the executive branch, with duties as are prescribed by law); NRS 227.230(1) (providing for the State Controller to direct the Attorney General to prosecute, "in the name of the State, all proper suits…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 227.230(1) — 1 case
Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 127 P.3d 1088 (Nev. 2006). “5, §§ 19, 22 (providing for the election of the Attorney General as part of the executive branch, with duties as are prescribed by law); NRS 227.230(1) (providing for the State Controller to direct the Attorney General to prosecute, "in the name of the State, all proper suits…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.