Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.064 (2026)

Permanent regulation: Prohibition against adoption until text approved or revised by Legislative Counsel; agency to provide written notification to Legislative Counsel of date of adoption; agency to issue statement of reasons for adoption upon request

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 233B.064 Permanent regulation: Prohibition against adoption until text approved or revised by Legislative Counsel; agency to provide written notification to Legislative Counsel of date of adoption; agency to issue statement of reasons for adoption upon request.

1. An agency shall not adopt, amend or repeal a permanent regulation until it has received from the Legislative Counsel the approved or revised text of the regulation in the form to be adopted. The agency shall immediately notify the Legislative Counsel in writing of the date of adoption of each regulation adopted.

2. Upon adoption of any regulation, the agency, if requested to do so by an interested person, either before adoption or within 30 days thereafter, shall issue a concise statement of the principal reasons for and against its adoption, and incorporate therein its reason for overruling the consideration urged against its adoption.

(Added to NRS by 1977, 1382; A 1997, 1391)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Labor Comm'r v. Littlefield, 153 P.3d 26 (Nev. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Labor Comm'r v. Littlefield, 153 P.3d 26 (Nev. 2007). · cites it 2× “063(1); NRS 233B.064(1); NRS 233B.064(2); NRS 233B.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.064(1) — 1 case

Labor Comm'r v. Littlefield, 153 P.3d 26 (Nev. 2007). “063(1); NRS 233B.064(1); NRS 233B.064(2); NRS 233B.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.064(2) — 1 case

Labor Comm'r v. Littlefield, 153 P.3d 26 (Nev. 2007). “063(1); NRS 233B.064(1); NRS 233B.064(2); NRS 233B.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.