Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.090 (2026)
Rebuttable presumption of regularity of adoption and filing of regulation
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.090 Rebuttable presumption of regularity of adoption and filing of
regulation. The Secretary of
State’s authenticated file stamp on the original of the final draft or revision
of a regulation raises a rebuttable presumption that the regulation was adopted
and filed in compliance with all requirements necessary to make it effective.
(Added to NRS by 1965, 965; A 1977, 1549)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2022 · leading case: The Nevada Indep. v. Whitley, 2022 NV 15 (Nev. 2022).
The Nevada Indep. v. Whitley, 2022 NV 15 (Nev. 2022). “See NRS 233B.090; Montage Mktg., LLC v. Washoe County ex rel.”
Dep't of Indus. Relations v. Circus Circus Enter., Inc., 705 P.2d 645 (Nev. 1985). “” NRS 233B.090. Our review of the record indicates that Circus Circus introduced no evidence to overcome this presumption of validity.”
Montage Mktg., LLC v. Washoe Cnty. ex rel. Washoe Cnty. Bd. of Equal., 419 P.3d 129 (Nev. 2018). “1295, which allows a discount to the value of the land, but not the improvements, of each individual parcel that makes up a subdivision.”
Nevada Dep't of Wildlife v. Bentz, 792 P.2d 28 (Nev. 1990). “We note that NRS 233B.090 states that there is a rebuttable presumption that a regulation by an administrative agency is valid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.