Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 244 - COUNTIES: GOVERNMENT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 244.250 (2026)

Unaudited claims to be presented within 6 months

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 244.250  Unaudited claims to be presented within 6 months.

      1.  All unaudited claims or accounts against any county shall be presented to the board of county commissioners within 6 months from the time such claims or accounts become due or payable.

      2.  No claim or account against any county shall be audited, allowed or paid by the board of county commissioners, or any other officer of the county, unless the provisions of subsection 1 are strictly complied with.

      [25:80:1865; A 1945, 21; 1943 NCL § 1957] + [26:80:1865; B § 3094; BH § 1966; C § 2128; RL § 1525; NCL § 1958]—(NRS A 1971, 865)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1963–1990 · leading case: Turner v. Staggs, 510 P.2d 879 (Nev. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Turner v. Staggs, 510 P.2d 879 (Nev. 1973). · cites it 16× “245 and NRS 244.250. [3] See also, NRS 41.031 and NRS 41.”
Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Cnty. of Clark, 643 F. Supp. 93 (D. Nev. 1986). · cites it 7× “In 1980 NRS 244.250 provided, and still provides: 1.”
Lunday Ex Rel. Lunday v. Vogelmann, 213 N.W.2d 904 (Iowa 1973). · cites it 2× “245 and NRS 244.250 as applied to governmental torts deny equal protection guaranteed by the United States Constitution.”
Rice v. Clark Cnty., 382 P.2d 605 (Nev. 1963). · cites it 2× “" NRS 244.250: "1. All unaudited claims or accounts against any county shall be presented to the board of county commissioners, duly certified by the claimant, within 6 months from the time such claims or accounts become due or payable.”
Alper v. Clark Cnty., 571 P.2d 810 (Nev. 1977). · cites it 2× “245 1 and NRS 244.250, 2 the Six Months’ Claims Statutes, apply to a *571 claim for damages in an inverse condemnation proceeding brought by a property owner against a county.”
Barney v. Cnty. of Clark, 389 P.2d 392 (Nev. 1964). “250 are unconstitutional if applicable to a minor who was eleven months and six days old at the time of the death of decedent.”
King v. Baskin, 511 P.2d 115 (Nev. 1973). “See: NRS 244.250. On the authority of Turner v.”
Colby v. Lyon Cnty., 515 P.2d 672 (Nev. 1973). · cites it 2× “OPINION Per Curiam: Relying on NRS 244.250, the lower court granted summary judgment.”
Scott Plaza, Inc. v. Clark Cnty., 792 P.2d 398 (Nev. 1990). · cites it 3× “Therefore, we reverse the order granting the County’s motion for sumihary judgment and denying Scott Plaza’s motion for summary judgment. Concurrent with its cross-motion for summary judgment, appellant filed a motion to amend its complaint to allege that it had presented a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.