Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 248 - SHERIFFS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 248.100

Attendance at sessions of district court required in certain counties; duty to obey lawful orders of district court and to execute process, writs and warrants

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 248.100  Attendance at sessions of district court required in certain counties; duty to obey lawful orders of district court and to execute process, writs and warrants.  The sheriff shall:

      1.  Except in a county whose population is 700,000 or more, attend in person, or by deputy, all sessions of the district court in his or her county.

      2.  Obey all the lawful orders and directions of the district court in his or her county.

      3.  Execute the process, writs or warrants of courts of justice, judicial officers and coroners, when delivered to the sheriff for that purpose.

      [6:38:1861; A 1873, 115; B § 2957; BH § 2124; C § 2245; RL § 1648; NCL § 2149]—(NRS A 2001, 1455; 2007, 2189; 2011, 1128; 2015, 2514)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: VEIL VS. BENNETT
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev · cites it 26× “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev · cites it 13× “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 248.100(1)(b) — 2 cases
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 248.100(1)(c) — 2 cases
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
VEIL VS. BENNETT (2015) nev “The district court granted the petition, explaining that NRS 248.100 imposed on Sheriff Veil a duty to execute warrants, and that in the modern age, this duty included entering warrant information into electronic databases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.