Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 278A - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 278A.400 (2026)

Enforcement by residents

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 278A.400  Enforcement by residents.

      1.  All provisions of the plan shall run in favor of the residents of the planned unit residential development, but only to the extent expressly provided in the plan and in accordance with the terms of the plan and to that extent such provisions, whether recorded by plat, covenant, easement or otherwise, may be enforced at law or equity by the residents acting individually, jointly or through an organization designated in the plan to act on their behalf.

      2.  No provision of the plan exists in favor of residents on the planned unit residential development except as to those portions of the plan which have been finally approved and have been recorded.

      (Added to NRS by 1973, 570)—(Substituted in revision for NRS 280A.370)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Glenbrook Homeowners Ass'n v. Glenbrook Co., 901 P.2d 132 (Nev. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Glenbrook Homeowners Ass'n v. Glenbrook Co., 901 P.2d 132 (Nev. 1995). · cites it 16× “380 and NRS 278A.400. The district court found that Glenbrook consistently maintained that the Glenbrook Golf Course was to remain privately owned, never promised to convey it to the Association, and never *913 annexed it to the CCRs.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 278A.400(1) — 1 case
Glenbrook Homeowners Ass'n v. Glenbrook Co., 901 P.2d 132 (Nev. 1995). “380 and NRS 278A.400. The district court found that Glenbrook consistently maintained that the Glenbrook Golf Course was to remain privately owned, never promised to convey it to the Association, and never *913 annexed it to the CCRs.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 278A.400(2) — 1 case
Glenbrook Homeowners Ass'n v. Glenbrook Co., 901 P.2d 132 (Nev. 1995). “380 and NRS 278A.400. The district court found that Glenbrook consistently maintained that the Glenbrook Golf Course was to remain privately owned, never promised to convey it to the Association, and never *913 annexed it to the CCRs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.