NRS
286.110 Public Employees’ Retirement System: Establishment; review of
System; use of state services; public inspection of certain records; liability
of public employers.
1. A system of retirement providing
benefits for the retirement, disability or death of employees of public
employers and funded on an actuarial reserve basis is hereby established and
must be known as the Public Employees’ Retirement System. The System is a
public agency supported by administrative fees transferred from the retirement funds.
The Executive and Legislative Departments of the State Government shall
regularly review the System.
2. The System is entitled to use any
services provided to state agencies and shall use the services of the
Purchasing Division of the Department of Administration, but is not required to
use any other service. The purpose of this subsection is to provide to the
Board the necessary autonomy for an efficient and economic administration of
the System and its program.
3. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 286.118, the official correspondence and
records and, except as otherwise provided in NRS
241.035, the minutes, audio recordings, transcripts and books of the System
are public records and are available for public inspection. A copy of the
minutes or audio recordings must be made available to a member of the public
upon request at no charge pursuant to NRS
241.035.
4. The respective participating public
employers are not liable for any obligation of the System.
[3:181:1947; 1943 NCL § 5230.03]—(NRS A 1975,
1030; 1977,
1576; 1993,
474, 1552;
1995,
524; 2005,
1409; 2013,
328; 2019,
1174)
Notes of Decisions
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 313 P.3d 221 (Nev. 2013).
· cites it 14× “Specifically, we address the scope of confidentiality set forth in NRS 286.110(3), which states that “[t]he official correspondence and records, other than the files of individual members or retired employees, .”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Nevada Policy Rsch. Inst., Inc., 2018 NV 81 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 28× “The requested information was not declared confidential by statute PERS argues that the district court's order would erroneously require PERS to extract information from government retirees' individual files that are protected by NRS 286.110(3) and NRS 286.117. According to…”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Nevada Policy Rsch. Inst., Inc., 2018 NV 81 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 28× “The requested information was not declared confidential by statute PERS argues that the district court's order would erroneously require PERS to extract information from government retirees' individual files that are protected by NRS 286.110(3) and NRS 286.117. According to…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 286.110(1) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 286.110(3) — 5 cases
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Reno Newspapers, Inc., 313 P.3d 221 (Nev. 2013).
“Specifically, we address the scope of confidentiality set forth in NRS 286.110(3), which states that “[t]he official correspondence and records, other than the files of individual members or retired employees, .”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Nevada Policy Rsch. Inst., Inc., 2018 NV 81 (Nev. 2018).
“The requested information was not declared confidential by statute PERS argues that the district court's order would erroneously require PERS to extract information from government retirees' individual files that are protected by NRS 286.110(3) and NRS 286.117. According to…”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Nevada Policy Rsch. Inst., Inc., 2018 NV 81 (Nev. 2018).
“The requested information was not declared confidential by statute PERS argues that the district court's order would erroneously require PERS to extract information from government retirees' individual files that are protected by NRS 286.110(3) and NRS 286.117. According to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.