Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 286 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 286.669 (2026)

Person convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter of member ineligible to receive benefits

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 286.669  Person convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter of member ineligible to receive benefits.  Any person convicted of the murder or voluntary manslaughter of a member of the System is ineligible to receive any benefit conferred by any provision of this chapter by reason of the death of that member. The System may withhold the payment of any benefit otherwise payable under this chapter by reason of the death of any member from any person charged with the murder or voluntary manslaughter of that member, pending final determination of those charges.

      (Added to NRS by 1979, 759)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2017–2017 · leading case: Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Gitter c/w 69208/69961, 2017 NV 18 (Nev. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Gitter c/w 69208/69961, 2017 NV 18 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 12× “NRS 286.669 provides that if the spouse is convicted of the murder or voluntary SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e.”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Gitter c/w 69208/69961, 2017 NV 18 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 6× “NRS 286.669 provides that if the spouse is convicted of the murder or voluntary SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e.”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Gitter c/w 69208/69961, 2017 NV 18 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 6× “NRS 286.669 provides that if the spouse is convicted of the murder or voluntary SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e.”
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Nevada Vs. Gitter c/w 69208/69961, 2017 NV 18 (Nev. 2017). · cites it 6× “NRS 286.669 provides that if the spouse is convicted of the murder or voluntary SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.