Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 34.300 (2026)

Rules of practice in mandamus proceedings

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 34.300 Rules of practice in mandamus proceedings. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 34.150 to 34.290, inclusive, the provisions of NRS and Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure relative to civil actions in the district court are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings mentioned in NRS 34.150 to 34.290, inclusive.

[1911 CPA § 770; RL § 5712; NCL § 9259]—(NRS A 1999, 176)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Cnty. of Clark v. Doumani, 952 P.2d 13 (Nev. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cnty. of Clark v. Doumani, 952 P.2d 13 (Nev. 1998). “See NRS 34.300 (provisions of NRS relative to civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in mandamus proceedings).”

City of Reno v. Dist. Ct. (conrad) (civil), 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 13 (Nev. 2026). “Even granting that alternative writs occupy a unique space 1n our jurisprudence, our caselaw disfavoring ex parte practice is so well established that we hold that a district court’s failure to consider the propriety of ex parte practice before issuing an ex parte alternative…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.