Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 353.085 (2026)

Procedure for payment of contract claims when no legislative appropriation has been made

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 353.085 Procedure for payment of contract claims when no legislative appropriation has been made.

1. The State Board of Examiners shall:

(a) Examine all claims arising out of contract and not under NRS 282.290 against the State presented to the Board by petition, for which no appropriation has been made and which require action by the Legislature.

(b) Take all evidence in regard to the same which may be offered by the claimant or deemed proper by the Board.

2. The evidence shall be reduced to writing, and the petition, the written evidence and the opinion of the Board in reference to the merits of the same shall be transmitted to the Legislature on the first day of its next session.

[5:32:1865; A 1869, 116; B § 2860; BH § 1895; C § 2021; RL § 4458; NCL § 6921]—(NRS A 1965, 1416)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1969–1986 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dep't of Health v. Capital Convalescent Ctr., Inc., 547 P.2d 677 (Nev. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State Ex Rel. Dep't of Health v. Capital Convalescent Ctr., Inc., 547 P.2d 677 (Nev. 1976). · cites it 3× “036 5 and NRS 353.085. 6 We do not believe that the aforementioned statutes have any application in the instant.”

Kaminski Ex Rel. Kaminski v. Woodbury, 462 P.2d 45 (Nev. 1969). · cites it 2× “Every claim against the state arising out of contract shall be presented in accordance with the provisions of NRS 353.085 to 353.100, inclusive, and every claim for refund in accordance with the provisions of NRS 353.”

Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Cnty. of Clark, 643 F. Supp. 93 (D. Nev. 1986). “It would be anomalous to hold that a defendant, in court in an action he did not bring, is required to plead a counterclaim against the State because it is compulsory under Rule 13(a), but once plead, his counterclaim is subject to dismissal on the ground that he had not, before…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.