Go Syfert

Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 357.250 (2026)

Entitlement of employee, contractor or agent to remedies in certain circumstances

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 357.250 Entitlement of employee, contractor or agent to remedies in certain circumstances.

1. If an employee, contractor or agent is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed or discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment as a result of any lawful act of the employee, contractor, agent or associated others in furtherance of an action brought pursuant to this chapter or any other effort to stop a violation of this chapter, the employee, contractor or agent is entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee, contractor or agent whole, including, without limitation, reinstatement with the same seniority as if the discharge, demotion, suspension, threat, harassment or discrimination had not occurred or damages in lieu of reinstatement if appropriate, twice the amount of lost compensation, interest on the lost compensation, any special damage sustained as a result of the discharge, demotion, suspension, threat, harassment or discrimination and punitive damages if appropriate. The employee, contractor or agent may also receive compensation for expenses recoverable pursuant to NRS 357.180, costs and attorney’s fees.

2. A civil action brought pursuant to this section may not be brought more than 3 years after the date on which the discharge, demotion, suspension, threat, harassment or discrimination occurred.

(Added to NRS by 1999, 829; A 2013, 1049; 2015, 915)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 29× “240 and NRS 357.250 As we have previously recognized, the FCA’s purpose is to expose and combat attempted fraud against the government; through it, private citizens are encouraged to disclose information regarding wrongful claims for governmental funds.”

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 127 P.3d 1088 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 2× “240; NRS 357.250. [6] NRS 357.230. [7] NRS 357.”

Goldman, Ed.D. Vs. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. C/W 78822 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 7× “080 suggests that those procedures apply to a cause of action brought under NRS 357.250, nor does NRS 357.250 specify any such procedures.”

Goldman, Ed.D. Vs. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. C/W 78822 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 7× “080 suggests that those procedures apply to a cause of action brought under NRS 357.250, nor does NRS 357.250 specify any such procedures.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 357.250(1) — 3 cases

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008). “240 and NRS 357.250 As we have previously recognized, the FCA’s purpose is to expose and combat attempted fraud against the government; through it, private citizens are encouraged to disclose information regarding wrongful claims for governmental funds.”

Goldman, Ed.D. Vs. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. C/W 78822 (Nev. 2020). “080 suggests that those procedures apply to a cause of action brought under NRS 357.250, nor does NRS 357.250 specify any such procedures.”

Goldman, Ed.D. Vs. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. C/W 78822 (Nev. 2020). “080 suggests that those procedures apply to a cause of action brought under NRS 357.250, nor does NRS 357.250 specify any such procedures.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 357.250(2) — 1 case

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008). “240 and NRS 357.250 As we have previously recognized, the FCA’s purpose is to expose and combat attempted fraud against the government; through it, private citizens are encouraged to disclose information regarding wrongful claims for governmental funds.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 357.250(2)(b) — 1 case

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008). “240 and NRS 357.250 As we have previously recognized, the FCA’s purpose is to expose and combat attempted fraud against the government; through it, private citizens are encouraged to disclose information regarding wrongful claims for governmental funds.”

— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 357.250(l) — 1 case

Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 179 P.3d 556 (Nev. 2008). “240 and NRS 357.250 As we have previously recognized, the FCA’s purpose is to expose and combat attempted fraud against the government; through it, private citizens are encouraged to disclose information regarding wrongful claims for governmental funds.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.