Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 37.112 (2026)

Valuation of property subject to condemnation as result of public work or project

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 37.112  Valuation of property subject to condemnation as result of public work or project.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, if the property is subject to condemnation as a result of a public work or public improvement, any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the property before the date of valuation which is caused by:

      (a) The public work or public improvement for which the property is acquired; or

      (b) The likelihood that the property would be acquired for such a purpose,

Ê must be disregarded when assessing the value of the property pursuant to NRS 37.110.

      2.  Any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the property before the date of valuation resulting from physical deterioration within the reasonable control of the owner is not required to be disregarded pursuant to subsection 1.

      (Added to NRS by 1993, 525)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2003–2003 · leading case: City of Las Vegas v. Bustos, 75 P.3d 351 (Nev. 2003).
City of Las Vegas v. Bustos, 75 P.3d 351 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 2× “” Kent further testified that although the government would not be willing to rezone the property once condemnation proceedings had been initiated, he could not take into account the depreciation in value due to the condemnation proceedings under NRS 37.112(1). 11 On the other…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 37.112(1) — 1 case
City of Las Vegas v. Bustos, 75 P.3d 351 (Nev. 2003). “” Kent further testified that although the government would not be willing to rezone the property once condemnation proceedings had been initiated, he could not take into account the depreciation in value due to the condemnation proceedings under NRS 37.112(1). 11 On the other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.