Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 387 - FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF SCHOOL SYSTEM
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 387.030 (2026)

Sources and distribution of State Education Fund

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 387.030  Sources and distribution of State Education Fund.  All money derived from interest on the State Permanent School Fund, together with all money derived from other sources provided by law, must:

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 387.191, be placed in the State Education Fund; and

      2.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 387.528, be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law.

      [91:32:1956]—(NRS A 1977, 231; 1987, 420; 1997, 1857, 2709; 1999, 599; 2009, 8; 2019, 4209)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2016 · leading case: Rogers v. Heller, 18 P.3d 1034 (Nev. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rogers v. Heller, 18 P.3d 1034 (Nev. 2001). · cites it 2× “The record shows that the state distributive school account derives its funding from the general fund appropriation under the state budget, from annual slot tax revenues, investment income, mineral land lease revenues, out-of-state sales tax, and estate tax revenues.”
Educ. Initiative PAC v. Comm. to Protect Nevada Jobs, 293 P.3d 874 (Nev. 2013). “DISCUSSION If enacted, the Education Initiative would require, among other things, that the margin tax revenues raised under the new law be deposited into the state Distributive School Account, which, in essence, is a subaccount of the State General Fund, NRS 387.030(1), and…”
Schwartz Vs. Lopez, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 4× “NRS 387.030. Money placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law.”
Duncan Vs. State, Off. of the State Treasurer, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 4× “NRS 387.030. Mon ey placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school distr icts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner prov ided by law.”
Schwartz Vs. Lopez, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 2× “NRS 387.030. Money placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law.”
Duncan Vs. State, Off. of the State Treasurer, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 2× “NRS 387.030. Mon ey placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school distr icts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner prov ided by law.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 387.030(1) — 1 case
Educ. Initiative PAC v. Comm. to Protect Nevada Jobs, 293 P.3d 874 (Nev. 2013). “DISCUSSION If enacted, the Education Initiative would require, among other things, that the margin tax revenues raised under the new law be deposited into the state Distributive School Account, which, in essence, is a subaccount of the State General Fund, NRS 387.030(1), and…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 387.030(2) — 4 cases
Schwartz Vs. Lopez, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 387.030. Money placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law.”
Duncan Vs. State, Off. of the State Treasurer, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 387.030. Mon ey placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school distr icts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner prov ided by law.”
Schwartz Vs. Lopez, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 387.030. Money placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school districts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner provided by law.”
Duncan Vs. State, Off. of the State Treasurer, 2016 NV 73 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 387.030. Mon ey placed in the DSA must "be apportioned among the several school distr icts and charter schools of this State at the times and in the manner prov ided by law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.