Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 40 - ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS IN PARTICULAR CASES CONCERNING PROPERTY
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.252 (2026)

Unlawful detainer: Contractual provisions void if contrary to specified periods of notice; notice to surrender by colessor is valid unless showing other colessors did not authorize notice

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 40.252  Unlawful detainer: Contractual provisions void if contrary to specified periods of notice; notice to surrender by colessor is valid unless showing other colessors did not authorize notice.  For the purposes of NRS 40.250 to 40.252, inclusive, and NRS 40.254:

      1.  It is unlawful for a landlord to attempt by contract or other agreement to shorten the specified periods of notice and any such contract or agreement is void.

      2.  Notice to surrender the premises which was given by one colessor of real property or a mobile home is valid unless it is affirmatively shown that one or more of the other colessors did not authorize the giving of the notice.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 227)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1998 · leading case: Lorenz v. Beltio, Ltd., 963 P.2d 488 (Nev. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lorenz v. Beltio, Ltd., 963 P.2d 488 (Nev. 1998). “Based on our review of the relevant facts and applicable law, we conclude that the district court properly determined that the lease terminated on January 23, 1992.”
Davidsohn v. Doyle, 825 P.2d 1227 (Nev. 1992). “) 5 However, under NRS 40.252, a contractual provision which attempts to shorten the notice period required in NRS 40.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.252(1) — 1 case
Lorenz v. Beltio, Ltd., 963 P.2d 488 (Nev. 1998). “Based on our review of the relevant facts and applicable law, we conclude that the district court properly determined that the lease terminated on January 23, 1992.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.