Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.133 (2026)

Conviction of crime is conclusive evidence of facts necessary to impose civil liability for related injury

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 41.133 Conviction of crime is conclusive evidence of facts necessary to impose civil liability for related injury. If an offender has been convicted of the crime which resulted in the injury to the victim, the judgment of conviction is conclusive evidence of all facts necessary to impose civil liability for the injury.

(Added to NRS by 1985, 968)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: Cromer v. Wilson, 225 P.3d 788 (Nev. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cromer v. Wilson, 225 P.3d 788 (Nev. 2010). · cites it 35× “The Cromers contend that the district court should have granted summary judgment on the issue of liability because NRS 41.133 allows a judgment of conviction to conclusively establish civil liability for a crime and should have precluded Wilson from arguing comparative fault…”

Langon v. Matamoros, 111 P.3d 1077 (Nev. 2005). · cites it 15× “: In this appeal, we consider whether NRS 41.133, which mandates that conviction of a crime resulting in injury to the victim is conclusive evidence of civil liability for the injury, applies to misdemeanor traffic violations.”

Lioce v. Cohen, 174 P.3d 970 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 2× “3d 1077, 1078-79 (2005) (concluding that NRS 41.133, which allows a judgment of conviction to conclusively establish civil liability for a crime, does not apply to misdemeanor traffic offenses).”

Stroud v. Cook, 931 F. Supp. 733 (D. Nev. 1996). · cites it 18× “Stroud argued that under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 41.133, Cook’s conviction for violating Section 484.”

Desert Cab Inc. v. Marino, 823 P.2d 898 (Nev. 1992). · cites it 4× “The court found this evidence “admissible pursuant to NRS 41.133 and NRS 41.130” to conclusively prove Edwards’ civil liability to Marino.”

Nicolaus v. West Side Transp., Inc., 185 F.R.D. 608 (D. Nev. 1999). · cites it 8× “” Nev.Rev.Stat § 41.133 (1997). This statute was implicated by the fact that Reimers, after rear-ending Plaintiff, was convicted in state court of violating Nevada Revised Statute section 484.”

McNair v. Rivera, 874 P.2d 1240 (Nev. 1994). “” 9 NRS 41.133 provides that “[i]f an offender has been convicted of the crime which resulted in the injury to the victim, the judgment of conviction is conclusive evidence of all facts necessary to impose civil liability for the injury.”

Lioce v. Cohen, 149 P.3d 916 (Nev. 2006). · cites it 2× “3d 1077, 1078-79 (2005) (concluding that NRS 41.133, which allows a judgment of conviction to conclusively establish civil liability for a crime, does not apply to misdemeanor traffic offenses).”

Seres v. Lerner, 102 P.3d 91 (Nev. 2004). “51 See NRS 41.133 (“If an offender has been convicted of the crime which resulted in the injury to the victim, the judgment of conviction is conclusive evidence of all facts necessary to impose civil liability for the injury.”

Richardson Vs. Dist. Ct. (Cabada) (Nev. 2021). · cites it 10× “Richardson urges this court to entertain this petition because the application of NRS 41.133 to misdemeanor DUI convictions is an important legal issue of statewide importance that requires clarification.”

Medchoice Retention Grp., Inc. v. Rand, 344 F. Supp. 3d 1184 (D. Nev. 2018). · cites it 8× “Rand admitted that he: acted with gross negligence, defined as wanton or reckless disregard for human life; and that he either knew that such conduct was a threat to the lives of others or knew of the circumstances that would reasonably cause him to foresee that such conduct…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.