Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530 (2026)

Adjudicatory hearing on petition; disposition

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 432B.530  Adjudicatory hearing on petition; disposition.

      1.  An adjudicatory hearing must be held within 30 days after the filing of the petition, unless good cause is shown or the hearing has been continued until a later date pursuant to NRS 432B.513.

      2.  At the hearing, the court shall inform the parties of the specific allegations in the petition and give them an opportunity to admit or deny them. If the allegations are denied, the court shall hear evidence on the petition.

      3.  In adjudicatory hearings, all relevant and material evidence helpful in determining the questions presented, including oral and written reports, may be received by the court and may be relied upon to the extent of its probative value. The parties or their attorney must be afforded an opportunity to examine and controvert written reports so received and to examine individuals making reports when reasonably available.

      4.  The court may require the child to be present in court at the hearing.

      5.  If the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was in need of protection at the time of the removal of the child from the home or, if the child was not removed from the home, at the time of the completion of the investigation by the agency which provides child welfare services, it shall record its findings of fact and may proceed immediately or at another hearing held within 15 working days, to make a proper disposition of the case. If the court finds that the allegations in the petition have not been established, it shall dismiss the petition and, if the child is in protective custody, order the immediate release of the child.

      6.  The findings of fact recorded by the court pursuant to subsection 5 and any specific allegations in the petition admitted to by the parties must be included as part of the disposition of the case in the report required to be made to the Central Registry pursuant to NRS 432B.310.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 1382; A 2001, 1703, 1846; 2003, 87; 2013, 2879; 2021, 2240)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: August H. v. State, 777 P.2d 901 (Nev. 1989).
August H. v. State, 777 P.2d 901 (Nev. 1989). · cites it 2× “Appellants next complain that the petition for temporary custody contained only conclusory allegations and thus did not give *445 them sufficient notice of the facts that they would have to defend against at the hearing on the petition.”
Roe v. Roe, 535 P.3d 274 (Nev. 2023). · cites it 2× “NRS 432B.530(3)(b) (stating that when a child is placed in the physical custody of a nonparent, "the court shall set forth good cause why the child was placed other than with a parent").”
Washoe Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Kory L.G., 295 P.3d 589 (Nev. 2013). · cites it 3× “See NRS 432B.530. “If the court finds that the allegations in the petition have not been established, it shall dismiss the petition” and order the child’s immediate release from protective custody.”
Clark Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Clark, 291 P.3d 122 (Nev. 2012). “The juvenile court stated that, although NRS 432B.530(3) allows for all relevant evidence to be admitted, it does not ‘ ‘require the Court to allow the admission of all hearsay reports.”
Cardenas-garcia v. Dist. Ct. (dept. of Fam. Serv.), 554 P.3d 231 (Nev. 2024). “See NRS 432B.530(5); NRS 432B.550; NRS 432B.590.”
In Re: A.t., a Minor (Fam.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 32 (Nev. 2025). · cites it 15× “530(2) The district court accepted Bellamy's no-contest plea under NRS 432B.530. District attorneys have routinely negotiated, and district courts have regularly accepted, no-contest pleas in other child protection cases.”
Tirikos Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2015 NV 77 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 4× “The court then must hold an adjudicatory hearing on the abuse-and-neglect petition within 30 days, NRS 432B.530(1), and annual hearings thereafter regarding the permanent placement of the child, NRS 432B.”
Tirikos Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2015 NV 77 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “The court then must hold an adjudicatory hearing on the abuse-and-neglect petition within 30 days, NRS 432B.530(1), and annual hearings thereafter regarding the permanent placement of the child, NRS 432B.”
In Re: K.M.S. (Nev. 2022). “Under NRS 432B.530, to sustain a petition alleging that the child is in need of protection, a preponderance of the evidence must show that a child is in need of protection at the time of removal from the home.”
in Re: Guardianship as to A.M. (Nev. 2013). “The evidentiary standard at a removal hearing is governed by NRS 432B.530(5), which requires a 4 Christina also argues that, as she had already been granted guardianship of A.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530(1) — 3 cases
Tirikos Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2015 NV 77 (Nev. 2015). “The court then must hold an adjudicatory hearing on the abuse-and-neglect petition within 30 days, NRS 432B.530(1), and annual hearings thereafter regarding the permanent placement of the child, NRS 432B.”
In Re: A.t., a Minor (Fam.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 32 (Nev. 2025). “530(2) The district court accepted Bellamy's no-contest plea under NRS 432B.530. District attorneys have routinely negotiated, and district courts have regularly accepted, no-contest pleas in other child protection cases.”
Tirikos Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2015 NV 77 (Nev. 2015). “The court then must hold an adjudicatory hearing on the abuse-and-neglect petition within 30 days, NRS 432B.530(1), and annual hearings thereafter regarding the permanent placement of the child, NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530(2) — 1 case
In Re: A.t., a Minor (Fam.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 32 (Nev. 2025). “530(2) The district court accepted Bellamy's no-contest plea under NRS 432B.530. District attorneys have routinely negotiated, and district courts have regularly accepted, no-contest pleas in other child protection cases.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530(3) — 1 case
Clark Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Clark, 291 P.3d 122 (Nev. 2012). “The juvenile court stated that, although NRS 432B.530(3) allows for all relevant evidence to be admitted, it does not ‘ ‘require the Court to allow the admission of all hearsay reports.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530(3)(b) — 1 case
Roe v. Roe, 535 P.3d 274 (Nev. 2023). “NRS 432B.530(3)(b) (stating that when a child is placed in the physical custody of a nonparent, "the court shall set forth good cause why the child was placed other than with a parent").”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.530(5) — 6 cases
Washoe Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Kory L.G., 295 P.3d 589 (Nev. 2013). “See NRS 432B.530. “If the court finds that the allegations in the petition have not been established, it shall dismiss the petition” and order the child’s immediate release from protective custody.”
August H. v. State, 777 P.2d 901 (Nev. 1989). “Appellants next complain that the petition for temporary custody contained only conclusory allegations and thus did not give *445 them sufficient notice of the facts that they would have to defend against at the hearing on the petition.”
Cardenas-garcia v. Dist. Ct. (dept. of Fam. Serv.), 554 P.3d 231 (Nev. 2024). “See NRS 432B.530(5); NRS 432B.550; NRS 432B.590.”
Tirikos Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2015 NV 77 (Nev. 2015). “The court then must hold an adjudicatory hearing on the abuse-and-neglect petition within 30 days, NRS 432B.530(1), and annual hearings thereafter regarding the permanent placement of the child, NRS 432B.”
in Re: Guardianship as to A.M. (Nev. 2013). “The evidentiary standard at a removal hearing is governed by NRS 432B.530(5), which requires a 4 Christina also argues that, as she had already been granted guardianship of A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.