Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 432B - PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.560 (2026)

Additional orders by court: Treatment; conduct; visitation; support

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 432B.560  Additional orders by court: Treatment; conduct; visitation; support.

      1.  The court may also order:

      (a) The child, a parent or the guardian to undergo such medical, psychiatric, psychological, or other care or treatment as the court considers to be in the best interests of the child.

      (b) A parent or guardian to refrain from:

             (1) Any harmful or offensive conduct toward the child, the other parent, the custodian of the child or the person given physical custody of the child; and

             (2) Visiting the child if the court determines that the visitation is not in the best interest of the child.

      (c) A reasonable right of visitation for a grandparent of the child if the child is not permitted to remain in the custody of the parents of the child.

      (d) Tests for the typing of blood or taking of specimens for genetic identification of the child, the natural mother of the child or the alleged father of the child pursuant to NRS 126.121.

      2.  The court shall order a parent or guardian to pay to the custodian an amount sufficient to support the child while the child is in the care of the custodian pursuant to an order of the court, unless the child was delivered to a provider of emergency services pursuant to NRS 432B.630. Payments for the obligation of support must be determined in accordance with the guidelines established by the Administrator of the Division of Social Services of the Department of Human Services pursuant to NRS 425.620, but must not exceed the reasonable cost of the child’s care, including food, shelter, clothing, medical care and education. An order for support made pursuant to this subsection must:

      (a) Require that payments be made to the appropriate agency or office;

      (b) Provide that the custodian is entitled to a lien on the obligor’s property in the event of nonpayment of support; and

      (c) Provide for the immediate withholding of income for the payment of support unless:

             (1) All parties enter into an alternative written agreement; or

             (2) One party demonstrates and the court finds good cause to postpone the withholding.

      3.  A court that enters an order pursuant to subsection 2 shall ensure that the social security number of the parent or guardian who is the subject of the order is:

      (a) Provided to the Division of Social Services of the Department of Human Services.

      (b) Placed in the records relating to the matter and, except as otherwise required to carry out a specific statute, maintained in a confidential manner.

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 1383; A 1987, 1196; 1991, 1339; 1993, 543; 1997, 2267; 1999, 2685; 2001, 1262; 2017, 677, 1014, 2291)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2022 · leading case: Div. of Child & Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 92 P.3d 1239 (Nev. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Div. of Child & Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 92 P.3d 1239 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 5× “Because the Nevada Legislature enacted NRS 432B.560 and NRS 432B.580 *451 in 1985, 14 the O’Bryan holding does not reflect the subsequent legislative enactments.”
Washoe Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Kory L.G., 295 P.3d 589 (Nev. 2013). · cites it 5× “: In this appeal, we consider whether a parent of a child placed into state custody and made the subject of a dependency proceeding, based on the neglectful actions of the other parent, is required to comply with a case plan and accept services under NRS 432B.560 for purposes of…”
Monahan v. Hogan, 507 P.3d 588 (Nev. 2022). “480 (basing whether a child COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 9 should be placed in protective custody on "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.560(1) (stating that the court may issue orders for treatment and visitation in "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.”
Monahan v. Hogan (child Custody), 2022 NV 7 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “480 (basing whether a child COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 9 should be placed in protective custody on "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.560(1) (stating that the court may issue orders for treatment and visitation in "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 8× “The State also contends that NRS 432B.560(1) authorizes the court to order the parent to complete any treatment that it deems to be in the best interest of the child.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 4× “540 does not give the district court broad discretion to create requirements that are absent from the State's petition. The State disagrees, arguing that NRS 432B.”
Roberson Vs. Dist. Ct. (Clark Cty. Dep'T Of Fam. Servs.) (Nev. 2019). “ifei NRS 432B.560 authorizes the district court to order a child to undergo medical treatment when it is in the child's best interest to do so.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.560(1) — 4 cases
Monahan v. Hogan, 507 P.3d 588 (Nev. 2022). “480 (basing whether a child COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 9 should be placed in protective custody on "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.560(1) (stating that the court may issue orders for treatment and visitation in "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.”
Monahan v. Hogan (child Custody), 2022 NV 7 (Nev. 2022). “480 (basing whether a child COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 9 should be placed in protective custody on "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.560(1) (stating that the court may issue orders for treatment and visitation in "the best interests of the child"); NRS 432B.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “The State also contends that NRS 432B.560(1) authorizes the court to order the parent to complete any treatment that it deems to be in the best interest of the child.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “540 does not give the district court broad discretion to create requirements that are absent from the State's petition. The State disagrees, arguing that NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.560(1)(a) — 4 cases
Div. of Child & Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 92 P.3d 1239 (Nev. 2004). “Because the Nevada Legislature enacted NRS 432B.560 and NRS 432B.580 *451 in 1985, 14 the O’Bryan holding does not reflect the subsequent legislative enactments.”
Washoe Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Kory L.G., 295 P.3d 589 (Nev. 2013). “: In this appeal, we consider whether a parent of a child placed into state custody and made the subject of a dependency proceeding, based on the neglectful actions of the other parent, is required to comply with a case plan and accept services under NRS 432B.560 for purposes of…”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “The State also contends that NRS 432B.560(1) authorizes the court to order the parent to complete any treatment that it deems to be in the best interest of the child.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “540 does not give the district court broad discretion to create requirements that are absent from the State's petition. The State disagrees, arguing that NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.560(1)(b)(1) — 2 cases
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “The State also contends that NRS 432B.560(1) authorizes the court to order the parent to complete any treatment that it deems to be in the best interest of the child.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “540 does not give the district court broad discretion to create requirements that are absent from the State's petition. The State disagrees, arguing that NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.560(l)(a) — 1 case
Div. of Child & Fam. Servs. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 92 P.3d 1239 (Nev. 2004). “Because the Nevada Legislature enacted NRS 432B.560 and NRS 432B.580 *451 in 1985, 14 the O’Bryan holding does not reflect the subsequent legislative enactments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.