Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 455.240 (2026)
Liability for violation causing contact with line
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 455.240 Liability for violation causing contact with line. If an act constituting a violation of any
provision of this chapter causes contact with an overhead line carrying high
voltage, each person who committed the violation or caused another person to
commit the violation shall pay the public utility operating the overhead line
carrying high voltage for:
1. All damages to property of the public utility;
2. All reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the public utility as a result of the contact; and
3. The costs and expenses incurred by the public utility as a result of the contact for damages to third persons.
Ê Each person who committed a violation causing the contact or who caused another person to commit a violation causing the contact is jointly and severally liable for the payment required by this section.
(Added to NRS by 1993, 879)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–2004 · leading case: Nevada Power Co. v. Haggerty, 989 P.2d 870 (Nev. 1999).
Nevada Power Co. v. Haggerty, 989 P.2d 870 (Nev. 1999). “Does the definition of "overhead line" contained in NRS 455.200 encompass electrical equipment located within a building? II.”
Snyder v. PacifiCorp, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (D. Utah 2004). “Finding that NRS 455.240 constitutes an exception to the employer immunity provision fully promotes the purpose of the overhead power line statutes with minimal interference with the general purpose of the workers’ compensation laws.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 455.240(3) — 2 cases
Nevada Power Co. v. Haggerty, 989 P.2d 870 (Nev. 1999). “Does the definition of "overhead line" contained in NRS 455.200 encompass electrical equipment located within a building? II.”
Snyder v. PacifiCorp, 316 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (D. Utah 2004). “Finding that NRS 455.240 constitutes an exception to the employer immunity provision fully promotes the purpose of the overhead power line statutes with minimal interference with the general purpose of the workers’ compensation laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.