Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 463 - LICENSING AND CONTROL OF GAMING
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.3662 (2026)

Judicial review: Petition; intervention; stay of enforcement

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 463.3662  Judicial review: Petition; intervention; stay of enforcement.

      1.  Any person aggrieved by a final decision or order of the Board or the hearing examiner made after hearing by the Board pursuant to NRS 463.361 to 463.366, inclusive, may obtain a judicial review thereof in the district court of the county in which the dispute between the licensee and patron arose.

      2.  The judicial review must be instituted by filing a petition within 20 days after the effective date of the final decision or order. The petition must set forth the order or decision appealed from and the grounds or reasons why the petitioner contends that a reversal or modification should be ordered.

      3.  Copies of the petition must be served upon the Board and all other parties of record, or their counsel of record, either personally or by certified mail.

      4.  The court, upon a proper showing, may permit other interested persons to intervene as parties to the appeal or as friends of the court.

      5.  The filing of the petition does not stay enforcement of the decision or order of the Board or the hearing examiner, but the Board itself may grant a stay upon such terms and conditions as it deems proper.

      (Added to NRS by 1987, 1276; A 1989, 1265; 1991, 930)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Harrah's Club v. Nevada State Gaming Control Bd., 766 P.2d 900 (Nev. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harrah's Club v. Nevada State Gaming Control Bd., 766 P.2d 900 (Nev. 1988). “365 was repealed in 1987 and replaced by NRS 463.3662 and 463.3668. 2 We have the fullest confidence that the NGCB will act with alacrity and dispatch to produce a final order.”
Friedlander v. Tamarack Junction Race & Sports Book (civil), 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 23 (Nev. 2026). “363, and subsequently for judicial review by a district court, NRS 463.3662(1). An appellate court may further review the decision, assuming the same role as that of the district court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.3662(1) — 1 case
Friedlander v. Tamarack Junction Race & Sports Book (civil), 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 23 (Nev. 2026). “363, and subsequently for judicial review by a district court, NRS 463.3662(1). An appellate court may further review the decision, assuming the same role as that of the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.