Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 482 - MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAILERS: LICENSING, REGISTRATION, SALES AND LEASES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 482.36363 (2026)

Hearings: Burden of proof; consideration of economic effect

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 482.36363  Hearings: Burden of proof; consideration of economic effect.

      1.  In any hearing on a protest filed pursuant to NRS 482.36352, 482.36354 or 482.36357, the manufacturer or distributor has the burden of proof to establish that there is good cause to terminate, refuse to continue, modify or replace a franchise, or to establish an additional dealership or relocate an existing dealership.

      2.  In any hearing on a protest filed pursuant to NRS 482.36357, the Director shall consider the economic effect of the proposed action upon the protesting dealer.

      (Added to NRS by 1981, 701; A 1999, 2510)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2015 · leading case: Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 645 N.E.2d 946 (Ill. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 645 N.E.2d 946 (Ill. 1994). · cites it 2× “Nev.Rev.Stat. § 482.36363 (1993). Appellants claim that unlike the Nevada statute declared unconstitutional in Desert Chrysler-Plymouth , our Act does not require the judiciary to act as licensing entity or to undertake an independent prelicensing, fact-finding function.”
Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc., 776 F.3d 411 (6th Cir. 2015). “” Nev.Rev.Stat. § 482.36363(2). Upon a finding of no good cause, the new dealership is prohibited from operating.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 482.36363(2) — 1 case
Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc., 776 F.3d 411 (6th Cir. 2015). “” Nev.Rev.Stat. § 482.36363(2). Upon a finding of no good cause, the new dealership is prohibited from operating.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.