NRS
484C.150 Implied consent to preliminary test of person’s breath; effect
of failure to submit to test; prohibited use of test results in criminal
action.
1. Any person who drives or is in actual
physical control of a vehicle on a highway or on premises to which the public
has access shall be deemed to have given his or her consent to a preliminary
test of his or her breath to determine the concentration of alcohol in his or
her breath when the test is administered at the request of a police officer at the
scene of a vehicle crash or where the police officer stops a vehicle, if the
officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be tested was:
(a) Driving or in actual physical control of a
vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a controlled
substance; or
(b) Engaging in any other conduct prohibited by NRS 484C.110, 484C.120, 484C.130 or 484C.430.
2. If the person fails to submit to the
test, the officer shall, if reasonable grounds otherwise exist, arrest the
person and take him or her to a convenient place for the administration of a
reasonably available evidentiary test under NRS
484C.160.
3. The result of the preliminary test must
not be used in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable
grounds to make an arrest.
(Added to NRS by 1983,
1066; A 1993,
2072; 1995,
1883; 1999,
2453, 3424;
2001,
172; 2005,
148; 2007,
2802; 2015,
1638, 2535;
2021,
2454)—(Substituted in revision for NRS 484.382)
Notes of Decisions
Jonathan Albert Leal v. State, 452 S.W.3d 14 (Tex. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “01 (Westlaw); Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 484C.150, 484C.160 (Westlaw) (permitting use of “reasonable force” under certain circumstances when a person refuses); N.”
State v. Sample, 414 P.3d 814 (Nev. 2018).
“Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
State Vs. Sample (gregory), 2018 NV 23 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Because the PBT 1 Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
Hagh (Russ) Vs. State, 476 P.3d 435 (Nev. 2020).
· cites it 2× “NRS 484C.150(3) provides that "Nile result of the preliminary test must not be used in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
Hay v. Kruger (D. Nev. 2024).
· cites it 2× “, NRS § 484C.150, required 25 Hay to submit to performing a PBT under the circumstances.”
State Vs. Sample (gregory), 2018 NV 23 (Nev. 2018).
“Because the PBT 1 Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484C.150(1) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484C.150(3) — 4 cases
State v. Sample, 414 P.3d 814 (Nev. 2018).
“Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
State Vs. Sample (gregory), 2018 NV 23 (Nev. 2018).
“Because the PBT 1 Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
Hagh (Russ) Vs. State, 476 P.3d 435 (Nev. 2020).
“NRS 484C.150(3) provides that "Nile result of the preliminary test must not be used in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
State Vs. Sample (gregory), 2018 NV 23 (Nev. 2018).
“Because the PBT 1 Pursuant to NRS 484C.150(3), PBT results are not admissible "in any criminal action, except to show there were reasonable grounds to make an arrest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.