Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 52 - DOCUMENTARY AND OTHER PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.275 (2026)

Summaries

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 52.275  Summaries.

      1.  The contents of voluminous writings, recordings or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary or calculation.

      2.  The originals shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. The judge may order that the originals be produced in court.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 801)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–2019 · leading case: Summa Corp. v. Greenspun, 607 P.2d 569 (Nev. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Summa Corp. v. Greenspun, 607 P.2d 569 (Nev. 1980). · cites it 2× “The original papers were not made available for examination or copying, or both, as provided by NRS 52.275, and objection was interposed on that ground.”
Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking Assocs., 734 P.2d 1236 (Nev. 1987). “Under NRS 52.275, the contents of “voluminous writings” may be presented “in the form of a chart, summary or calculation” if the writings themselves “cannot conveniently be examined in court.”
Bombardier Transp. (Holdings) USA, Inc. v. Nev. Labor Comm'r, 433 P.3d 248 (Nev. 2019). “We decline to consider whether Bombardier's other maintenance projects on light rails, monorails, and its out-of-state railroad holdings make it a railroad company because such projects are not exempted under NRS 338.080(1).”
Bombardier Transp. (holdings) USA Inc. Vs. Nevada Labor Comm'r, 2019 NV 3 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “410(1), and may °On appeal, Bombardier argues that the primary work summary exhibit was inadmissible under NRS 52.275, which concerns the admissibility of voluminous writings.”
Bombardier Transp. (holdings) USA Inc. Vs. Nevada Labor Comm'r, 2019 NV 3 (Nev. 2019). “410(1), and may °On appeal, Bombardier argues that the primary work summary exhibit was inadmissible under NRS 52.275, which concerns the admissibility of voluminous writings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.