Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 533.200 (2026)

Appeal from decree to appellate court: Procedure; service of notice of appeal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 533.200  Appeal from decree to appellate court: Procedure; service of notice of appeal.  Appeals from such decree may be taken to the appellate court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 4 of Article 6 of the Nevada Constitution by the State Engineer or any party in interest in the same manner and with the same effect as in civil cases, except as to the following matters. Notice of appeal shall be served upon the attorneys of record for claimants who have filed exceptions or objections to the final order of determination of the State Engineer as provided in NRS 533.170, and all claimants or water users who have not filed exceptions or objections to the final order of determination or appeared in the cause by an attorney shall be served with a copy of notice of appeal by the service of a copy thereof on the Attorney General as their process agent.

      [Part 36:140:1913; A 1915, 378; 1931, 413; 1937, 327; 1931 NCL § 7923]—(NRS A 2013, 1786)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2022 · leading case: In Re: The Determination Rights To Water Located Within Diamond Valley Hydrographic Basin No. 10-153 (Nev. 2022).
In Re: The Determination Rights To Water Located Within Diamond Valley Hydrographic Basin No. 10-153 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 4× “NRS 533.200 provides for appeals "from such decree" pursuant to the NRAP and "in the same manner and with the same effect as in civil cases," except that notice must be provided not only to those who filed exceptions, but also to claimants and water users who have not appeared…”
Jackson Vs. Groenendyke, 2016 NV 25 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 3× “" NRS 533.200. This court reviews a district court's factual findings for an abuse of discretion and will not set aside those findings unless they are SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A e clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence.”
Jackson Vs. Groenendyke, 2016 NV 25 (Nev. 2016). “" NRS 533.200. This court reviews a district court's factual findings for an abuse of discretion and will not set aside those findings unless they are SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A e clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.