Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 533.200 (2026)
Appeal from decree to appellate court: Procedure; service of notice of appeal
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 533.200 Appeal from decree to appellate court: Procedure; service of
notice of appeal. Appeals from
such decree may be taken to the appellate court of competent jurisdiction
pursuant to the rules fixed by the Supreme Court pursuant to Section 4 of Article 6 of the Nevada
Constitution by the State Engineer or any party in interest in the same manner
and with the same effect as in civil cases, except as to the following matters.
Notice of appeal shall be served upon the attorneys of record for claimants who
have filed exceptions or objections to the final order of determination of the
State Engineer as provided in NRS 533.170,
and all claimants or water users who have not filed exceptions or objections to
the final order of determination or appeared in the cause by an attorney shall
be served with a copy of notice of appeal by the service of a copy thereof on
the Attorney General as their process agent.
[Part 36:140:1913; A 1915, 378; 1931, 413; 1937, 327; 1931 NCL § 7923]—(NRS A 2013, 1786)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2022 · leading case: In Re: The Determination Rights To Water Located Within Diamond Valley Hydrographic Basin No. 10-153 (Nev. 2022).
In Re: The Determination Rights To Water Located Within Diamond Valley Hydrographic Basin No. 10-153 (Nev. 2022). “NRS 533.200 provides for appeals "from such decree" pursuant to the NRAP and "in the same manner and with the same effect as in civil cases," except that notice must be provided not only to those who filed exceptions, but also to claimants and water users who have not appeared…”
Jackson Vs. Groenendyke, 2016 NV 25 (Nev. 2016). “" NRS 533.200. This court reviews a district court's factual findings for an abuse of discretion and will not set aside those findings unless they are SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A e clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence.”
Jackson Vs. Groenendyke, 2016 NV 25 (Nev. 2016). “" NRS 533.200. This court reviews a district court's factual findings for an abuse of discretion and will not set aside those findings unless they are SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A e clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.