NRS
612.380 Leaving last or next to last employment without good cause or to
seek other employment.
1. Except as otherwise provided in
subsection 2, a person is ineligible for benefits for the week in which the
person has voluntarily left his or her last or next to last employment:
(a) Without good cause, if so found by the Administrator,
and until the person earns remuneration in covered employment equal to or
exceeding his or her weekly benefit amount in each of 10 weeks.
(b) To seek other employment and for all
subsequent weeks until the person secures other employment or until he or she
earns remuneration in covered employment equal to or exceeding his or her
weekly benefit amount in each of 10 weeks, if so found by the Administrator.
2. A person is not ineligible for benefits
solely because he or she left employment which was not suitable to enter
training approved pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2296.
3. As used in subsection 2, employment is
“suitable” if the work is of a substantially equal or higher level of skill
than the person’s past adversely affected employment, and the wages are not
less than 80 percent of the person’s average weekly wage at his or her past
adversely affected employment.
[Part 5:129:1937; A 1939,
115; 1941,
412; 1943,
239; 1947,
413; 1949,
277; 1951,
339; 1955,
698]—(NRS A 1973,
1782; 1975,
1000; 1977,
872; 1981,
690; 1985,
163; 1993,
1823; 1997,
2393)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
12
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case:
McCracken v. Fancy, 639 P.2d 552 (Nev. 1982).
McCracken v. Fancy, 639 P.2d 552 (Nev. 1982).
· cites it 5× “See NRS 612.380. Fancy appealed to the NESD’s appeals tribunal.”
Dolores v. State, 416 P.3d 259 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 10× “: In this appeal, we consider whether submitting a resignation when faced with a resign-or-be-fired option is a voluntary resignation under NRS 612.380, thereby disqualifying an individual from unemployment benefits.”
State, Emp. Sec. Dep't v. Weber, 676 P.2d 1318 (Nev. 1984).
· cites it 2× “The Board’s decision denied unemployment benefits to respondent on the ground that he had voluntarily left his last employment without good cause within the meaning of NRS 612.380. 1 The record reveals that respondent was a taxicab driver who eventually stopped showing up for…”
State, Emp. SEC. Dept v. Evans, 901 P.2d 156 (Nev. 1995).
· cites it 2× “The district court correctly held that Evans' missing work because she could not afford to post bail was not sufficient ground to deny benefits.”
Hardin v. Jones, 727 P.2d 551 (Nev. 1986).
“See NRS 612.380; NRS 612.445. The notice of the initial *470 determination, which was mailed to appellant on February 8, 1985, informed appellant that the decision of the executive director would become final on February 19, 1985, eleven days after mailing, unless appellant…”
Dolores Vs. State, Dep't of Emp. Sec. Div., 2018 NV 34 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 20× “: In this appeal, we consider whether submitting a resignation when faced with a resign-or-be-fired option is a voluntary resignation under NRS 612.380, thereby disqualifying an individual from unemployment benefits.”
Dolores Vs. State, Dep't of Emp. Sec. Div., 2018 NV 34 (Nev. 2018).
· cites it 20× “: In this appeal, we consider whether submitting a resignation when faced with a resign-or-be-fired option is a voluntary resignation under NRS 612.380, thereby disqualifying an individual from unemployment benefits.”
State, Dept. of Emp. Sec. Div. Vs. Murphy, 2016 NV 18 (Nev. 2016).
· cites it 3× “, the employee's absence was neither deliberate nor voluntary, and we noted that the "Two of those statutes are not germane to this appeal: NRS 612.380 applies when an employee voluntarily leaves without good cause or to seek other employment, and NRS 612.”
State, Emp'T Sec. Div. v. Eppinger (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “See NRS 612.380. An appeals referee upheld the decision to deny benefits, and the Board of Review affirmed the referee's decision.”
State, Emp'T Sec. Div. v. Eppinger (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “See NRS 612.380.' An appeals referee upheld the decision to deny benefits, and the Board of Review affirmed the referee's decision.”
State, Dept. of Emp. Sec. Div. Vs. Murphy, 2016 NV 18 (Nev. 2016).
“, the employee's absence was neither deliberate nor voluntary, and we noted that the 1 Two of those statutes are not germane to this appeal: NRS 612.380 applies when an employee voluntarily leaves without good cause or to seek other employment, and NRS 612.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.380(1) — 1 case
McCracken v. Fancy, 639 P.2d 552 (Nev. 1982).
“See NRS 612.380. Fancy appealed to the NESD’s appeals tribunal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.