Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 612.525 (2026)

Appeal to courts: Time for appeal; exhaustion of administrative remedies; appeal by Administrator

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NRS 612.525 Appeal to courts: Time for appeal; exhaustion of administrative remedies; appeal by Administrator.

1. Any decision of the Board of Review in the absence of an appeal therefrom as herein provided becomes final 11 days after the date of notification by electronic transmission or mailing thereof, and judicial review thereof is permitted only after any party claiming to be aggrieved thereby has exhausted administrative remedies as provided by this chapter.

2. The Administrator shall be deemed to be a party to any judicial action involving any such decision, and may be represented in any such judicial action by:

(a) Any qualified attorney employed by the Administrator and designated by the Administrator for that purpose; or

(b) The Attorney General, at the Administrator’s request.

3. The Administrator may appeal from any decision of the Board of Review to the courts as may any other party to that decision.

[6:129:1937; renumbered 6.15:129:1937 and A 1951, 348]—(NRS A 1993, 1831; 2005, 448; 2021, 1481)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't v. Cline, 847 P.2d 736 (Nev. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nevada Emp. Sec. Dep't v. Cline, 847 P.2d 736 (Nev. 1993). “Pursuant to NRS 612.525, Cline filed a petition for judicial review with the district court.”

Moore v. State of Nevada (D. Nev. 2020). “6, 2012), citing NRS 612.525. 33 Peck v. Nev., Case No. 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF, 2018 WL 3312977 , at *3 (D.”

Rowe v. Nevada Off. of Unemployment (D. Nev. 2023). “6, 2012), citing NRS 612.525. Thus, this Court lacks subject 5 matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s appeal of DETR’s purported refusal to pay unemployment 6 benefits.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.